Table 3.

Differences for stationary behaviour and physical activity levels in absolute time between the different software, CoLaus study, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2014–2017, on 2693 participants.

	Stationary behaviour	Light physical activity	Moderate physical activity	Vigorous physical activity
GENEACTIV vs
PAMPRO	− 499 [− 555; − 443]	− 66 [− 80; − 53]	74 [41; 119]	− 22 [− 29; − 17]
GGIR-White	− 101 [− 157; − 44]	15 [− 9; 36]	141 [100; 192]	0 [0; 2]
GGIR-MRC, v.1.5–9	15 [− 28; 57]	− 83 [− 116; − 57]	130 [91; 177]	0 [− 1; 1]
GGIR-MRC, v.1.11–1	38 [1; 75]	− 99 [− 131; − 73]	128 [90; 174]	− 1 [− 1; 0]
PAMPRO vs
GGIR-White	403 [352; 452]	78 [60; 96]	66 [55; 78]	24 [17; 31]
GGIR-MRC, v.1.5–9	518 [478; 557]	− 20 [− 50; 7]	54 [44; 64]	23 [17; 30]
GGIR-MRC, v.1.11–1	542 [500; 582]	− 36 [− 67; − 9]	52 [42; 61]	23 [17; 30]
GGIR-White vs
GGIR-MRC, v.1.5–9	− 114 [− 138; − 89]	− 100 [− 122; − 78]	− 11 [− 16; − 7]	− 1 [− 1; 0]
GGIR-MRC, v.1.11–1	138 [106; 170]	− 116 [− 140; − 93]	− 13 [− 20; − 8]	− 1 [− 2; 0]
GGIR-MRC, v.1.5–9 vs
GGIR-MRC, v.1.11–1	23 [4; 42]	− 16 [− 24; − 7]	− 2 [− 5; 0]	0 [0; 0]

SB, stationary behaviour; PA, physical activity. Results are expressed as median and [interquartile range]. Positive/negative values indicate that the software indicated in bold overestimates/underestimates relative to the other. Between-group comparisons performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test; all differences are significant at p < 0.001.