Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 16;69(1):48–52. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2022-065

Table 1. In vivo development of mouse ICSI embryos using sperms with their tails artificially removed.

Animal Treatment of sperm Pre-activation of oocyte No. of oocytes injected No. of oocytes survived (%) * No. of embryos developed to
No. of embryos transferred No. of offspring (%) ***
pn (%) ** 2-cell (%) **
Mouse Piezo-cut 116 93 (80) 91 (98) 91 (98) 91 49 (54) a
Naturally tail less 55 53 (96) 52 (98) 50 (94) 50 8 (16) b
–30°CFT 119 110 (92) a 98 (89) 88 (80) 88 9 (10) b
–30°CFT + 60 60 (100) b 60 (100) 57 (95) 57 12 (22) b
LNFT 126 105 (83) 103 (98) 100 (95) 100 37 (37) b
LNFT + 60 55 (92) 55 (100) 51 (93) 51 10 (20) b
Glass-beads 60 52 (87) 18 (35) N.D. N.D. N.D.
Glass-beads + 119 111 (93) 111 (100) 105 (95) 105 19 (18) b
Trypsin 60 41 (68) a 11 (27) N.D. N.D. N.D.
Trypsin + 109 96 (88) b 93 (97) 93 (97) 93 48 (52) a
TS 60 44 (73) a 11 (25) N.D. N.D. N.D.
TS + 109 94 (86) b 93 (99) 89 (95) 89 23 (26) b

* Percentages relative to the number of oocytes injected. ** Percentages relative to the number of oocytes survived. *** Percentages relative to the number of embryos transferred. Each experiment was repeated three times. N.D.: not determined. pn: pronucleus. – indicates not artificially activated oocyte. + indicates artificially activated oocyte. Statistical analysis of oocyte viability was performed between – and + oocytes before activation for each treatment, and that of the number of offspring was performed between piezo-cut control and each treatment. Significant χ2 comparisons a vs. b, P < 0.05.