Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 27;13(1):128–141. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.08.016

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Four CRM subsets existed successively and exhibited different functions during ontogeny. (A) Selected categories from GO enrichment analysis of DEGs are expressed as –log10P value adjusted for multiple comparisons. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of Ki67 (left) and Aurora B (right) in cTNT positive neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes directly co-cultured with CRMs from mouse hearts of different ages (None, E18D, P7D, P4W, P1Y). The representative images are shown above and statistical analysis shown below. X axis presents different CRMs treatment. (C) Immunofluorescence staining of Ki67 and Aurora B in neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes co-cultured with CRMs from embryonic or neonatal mice directly or indirectly. The representative images are shown left and statistical analysis shown right. (D) Neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes were directly co-cultured with CRMs from embryonic and neonatal mouse hearts by cell–cell contact, CRMs were stained by F4/80, and the cardiomyocytes were stained by cTNT. For B and C, the data were repeated 3–5 times, similar data were obtained, the representative images are shown. ∗P < 0.05. E18D, P7D, P4W and P1Y mean embryonic Day 18, post-natal 7 days, 4 and 8 weeks, and 1-year-old, respectively.