Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 2;17(1):117–123. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01399-5

Table 1.

Robotic experience in training of USA and UK surgical trainees

Total (n = 116) USA trainees
(n = 34)
UK trainees (n = 58) Ireland trainees
(n = 24)
p value
Resident/registrar training year 0.045
 1–4, n (%) 22 (18.97) 5 (14.71) 9 (15.52) 8 (33.33)
 5–6, n (%) 42 (36.21) 8 (23.53) 24 (41.38) 10 (41.67)
 Post training, n (%) 52 (44.83) 21 (61.76) 25 (43.10) 6 (25.00)
Robotic simulator experience, hrs  < 0.00001*
 0, n (%) 42 (36.21) 0 (0) 36 (62.07) 6 (25.00)
 1–10, n (%) 44 (37.93) 24 (70.59) 10 (17.24) 10 (41.67)
  > 10, n (%) 30 (25.86) 10 (29.41) 12 (20.69) 8 (33.33)
Total number of procedures performed on robotic console  < 0.00001*
 0, n (%) 61 (53.51) 0 (0) 47 (81.03) 14 (58.33)
  < 15, n (%) 18 (15.79) 3 (8.82) 9 (15.52) 6 (25.00)
 15–30, n (%) 19 (16.38) 16 (47.06) 1 (1.72) 2 (8.33)
  > 30, n (%) 18 (15.79) 15 (44.12) 1 (1.72) 2 (8.33)
Access to robotic platform at workplace, n (%) 74 (63.79) 34 (100.00) 26 (44.83) 20 (83.33)  < 0.00001*
Adequate exposure to robotic surgery in training?  < 0.00001*
Yes, n (%) 32 (27.59) 22 (64.71) 8 (13.79) 2 (8.33)
No, n (%) 84 (72.41) 12 (35.29) 50 (86.21) 22 (91.67)