Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 26;9(2):e13145. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13145

Table 2.

Comparison of the SaO2 measurements of VSM, smartphone and BGA.

VSM SaO2 Smartphone SaO2 BGA-SaO2
Mean ± SD 92.6 ± 5.65 92.72 ± 5.72 92.5 ± 5.69
Median (min-max) 94 (72–99) 94 (72–99) 94 (72–100)
VSM-BGA SaO2 Smartphone-BGASaO2 VSM-Smartphone SaO2
Regression equation y = 0.7869 + −0.00748 x y = −0.3632 + 0.0063x y = 1.1597 + −0.0139 x
Intersection (95% CI) 0.7869 (−2.5911–4.1649) −0.3632 (−4.1927–3.4663) 1.1597 (−3.0247–5.3441)
Curve (95% CI) −0.00748 (−0.0439–0.02896) 0.0063 (−0.03498–0.04757) −0.0139 (-0.0589–0.0312)
ICC (95% CI) 0.967 (0.956–0.975) 0.957 (0.944–0.967) 0.949 (0.934–0.962)
p value for ICC <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

SaO2: Oxygen saturation, VSM: Vital signs monitor, SD: standard deviation; ICC: Intra-class correlation coefficient.