Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 2;9(2):e13393. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13393

Table 3.

Multiple regression analyses of association between interhospital transfer and ED length of stay or in-hospital outcomes in unmatched and propensity-matched patients.

Unadjusted β or OR (95% CI) Adjusted β or OR (95% CI)
Unmatched cohort (IHT, n=1856; non-IHT, n=16295)
 ED LOS (minutes)a −315.17c (−423.04, −207.30) −266.22c (−374.19, −158.26)
 Hospital LOS (days)a 2.55c (2.02, 3.10) 1.01c (0.50, 1.54)
 In-hospital deathb 1.63c (1.37, 1.93) 1.23c (1.02, 1.48)
Propensity-matched cohort (IHT, n=1856; non-IHT, n=7424)
 ED LOS (minutes)a −257.90c (−370.98, −144.83) −174.08c (−286.42, −61.74)
 Hospital LOS (days)a 2.19c (1.60, 2.79) 1.17c (0.61, 1.74)
 In-hospital deathb 1.35c (1.12, 1.64) 1.32c (1.08, 1.59)

IHT, interhospital transfer; LOS, length of stay; β, regression coefficient (ED LOS and hospital LOS); OR, odds ratio (in-hospital death); CI, confidence interval.

Non-IHT was used as the reference group for analyses.

In the propensity-matched analyses, the IHT and non-IHT groups were matched for sex, age, and other covariates that had significant differences between two groups to achieve a 1:4 balanced cohort. These covariates included hour of ED visit, year of ED visit, TTAS level, and coexisting diseases.

a

Linear regression with β

b

: Logistic regression with OR. Adjusted β or OR was obtained after adjustment for potential confounders.

c

P < 0.05.