Table 2.
Results of multiple hierarchical regression analysis predicting acceptance of VC.
Predictor | β | B | T | R 2 | Δ R2 | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step 1: Socio-demographic data | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||||
Sex: male | −0.07 | −0.07 | −0.88 | 0.381 | ||
Age | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.86 | 0.390 | ||
Educational level | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.754 | ||
Occupational status | −0.07 | −0.09 | −1.90 | 0.058 | ||
Same GP > 5 years | −0.08 | −0.08 | −0.97 | 0.335 | ||
Step 2: Medical data | 0.039 | 0.038 | ||||
Mental disorder | 0.16 | 0.16 | 1.10 | 0.274 | ||
No chronic condition | 0.14 | 0.14 | 1.31 | 0.191 | ||
No regular medication | −0.29 | −0.29 | −2.79 | 0.006 | ||
PHQ-2 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 1.28 | 0.201 | ||
GAD-2 | −0.08 | −0.09 | −1.72 | 0.086 | ||
Step 3: ICT-related data | 0.159 | 0.120 | ||||
Computer proficiency | 0.12 | 0.10 | 1.67 | 0.095 | ||
Mobile phone proficiency | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.40 | 0.688 | ||
Daily internet usage time | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.989 | ||
No prior use of video conferencing | −0.09 | −0.09 | −0.88 | 0.380 | ||
Knowledge about digital health care solutions | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.991 | ||
No prior use of VC | −0.33 | −0.33 | −1.44 | 0.152 | ||
Important to know GP in person | −0.24 | −0.24 | −1.79 | 0.075 | ||
Step 4: UTAUT predictors | 0.528 | 0.369 | ||||
Effort expectancy | 0.21 | 0.18 | 4.05 | <0.001 | ||
Performance expectancy | 0.23 | 0.24 | 5.44 | <0.001 | ||
Social influence | 0.49 | 0.45 | 9.63 | <0.001 |
Note: N = 371. In Steps 2, 3 and 4 only the newly included variables are presented. β: standardized coefficient beta; B: unstandardized coefficient beta; R2: determination coefficient; ΔR2: Changes in R2. GP: general practitioner; VC: video consultation; PHQ-2: Patient Health Questionnaire-2; GAD-2: generalized anxiety disorder-2; ICT: information and communications technology; UTAUT: unified theory of acceptance and use of technology.