Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 16;27:23312165231157255. doi: 10.1177/23312165231157255

Table 1.

Key Characteristics of Included Articles (n = 42).

Authors Year Country Study design Sampling method N Age (Mean ± SD unless otherwise reported) Hearing help-seeking Hearing aid uptake Level of evidence Quality rating
Cho et al. 2022 Korea Cross-sectional survey (P) NR 1464 70.4 ± 12.2 4 Fair
Weycker et al. 2021 USA Cohort (P) NR 579 56.0 3 Fair
Adorni et al. 2021 Italy True-experimental (P) Snowball 209 33.9 ± 13.0 2 Fair
Humes & Dubno 2021 USA Cross-sectional survey (P) Community sample: convenience Clinic samples: NR 764 Community: 68.6 ± 6.1 Clinic- No HA: 74.5 ± 7.0 Clinic- HA: 75.7 ± 6.7 4 Fair
Van Leeuwen et al. 2021 Netherlands Cohort (P) Convenience 218 Across two cohorts: 48.9 ± 10.0 to 49.7 ± 11.1 3 Fair
Tran et al. 2021 USA Cross-sectional survey (P) Convenience 1376 54.7 ± 17.4 4 Fair
Maidment & Wege 2021 England Cross-sectional (R) N/A 17172 Median: 77.0 4 Fair
Nixon et al. 2021 Australia Cohort (P) NR 85 70.2 ± 5.2 4 Fair
Humes 2021 USA Cohort (P) Convenience 139 Adherents 74.7 ± 7.7 years Nonadherents 72.7 ± 7.0 3 Fair
Chua Wei De 2021 Singapore Cross-sectional (R) N/A 109 Median: 76.0 3 Fair
Angara et al. 2021 USA Cross-sectional survey (R) N/A 5230 Range: 20.0–70.0+ 4 Fair
Sawyer et al. 2020 England Cross-sectional (R) N/A 2845 72.1 ± 9.1 4 Poor
Pronk et al. 2019 Netherlands Cluster randomized controlled trial (P) NR 267 66.9 2 Fair
Simpson et al. 2019 USA Cohort (P) Snowball 857 Adopted: 69.1 ± 8.6 Not adopted: 70.2 ± 10.6 3 Fair
Mukari & Hashim 2018 Malaysia Cohort (P) Stratified cluster random 301 68.4 ± 6.0 3 Fair
He et al. 2018 China Cross-sectional (R) Probability proportional 1503 74.5 ± 6.6 4 Fair
Singh & Launer 2018 Canada Cohort (R) N/A 24842 75.4 ± 13.5 4 Fair
Chan et al. 2017 USA Cross-sectional survey (P) NR 336 Urban: 66.3 Rural: 66.7 4 Fair
Sciacca et al. 2017 Australia Cross-sectional (P) Audiologists: Convenience Patients: Purposive 62 71.6 ± 9.1 4 Fair
Pronk et al. 2017 Netherlands Cross-sectional (P) Convenience 377 72.6 ± 8.0 4 Fair
Singh & Launer 2016 UK Cohort (R) N/A 60964 Alone: 70.4 ± 12.4 With other: 74.5 ± 11.6 4 Fair
Ridgway et al. 2016 Australia Cohort (P) NR 216 69.6 ± 10.5 3 Fair
Saunders et al. 2016 USA Cohort (P) NR 167 69.3 ± 7.5 3 Fair
Otavio et al. 2016 Brazil Cross-sectional (P) NR 32 71.4 ± 12.1 4 Fair
Ridgway et al. 2015 Australia Cohort (P) NR 253 69.9 ± 10.5 3 Fair
Moschis et al. 2015 USA Cross-sectional survey (P) Purposive 477 58.8 ± 7.1 4 Poor
Benova et al. 2015 England Cross-sectional survey (R) N/A 8780 Between 50.0–64.0: 46.4% Between 65.0–74.0: 29.7% 75.0+: 23.9% 4 Fair
Cobelli et al. 2014 Italy Cross-sectional survey (P) Purposive 243 69.5 ± 8.3 4 Fair
Meyer et al. 2014 Australia Cross-sectional (R) N/A 307 73.0 ± 7.2 4 Fair
Ham et al. 2014 Australia Cross-sectional survey (P) NR 251 72.0 ± 7.0 4 Poor
Kelly-Campbell & Parry 2014 USA Cross-sectional (P) Purposive 35 Adopters: 64.2 ± 5.1 Nonadopters: 62.0 ± 2.8 4 Good
Saunders et al. 2013 USA Cross-sectional survey (P) Convenience 223 Male: 61.1 ± 14.1 Female: 57.7 ± 14.0 4 Fair
Öberg et al. 2012 Sweden Cross-sectional survey (R) N/A 346 77.0 4 Fair
Robertson et al. 2012 USA Cross-sectional (R) N/A 144 Across three groups: 65.7 ± 2.9 to 67.6 ± 5.5 4 Fair
Meyer et al. 2011 Australia Cohort (P) Stratified cluster random 193 67.6 ± 12.3 3 Fair
Fischer et al. 2011 USA Cohort (P) NR 718 70.5 3 Fair
Meister et al. 2014 Germany Cross-sectional survey (P) Convenience 204 65.2 ± 9.9 4 Fair
Gopinath et al. 2011 Australia Cohort study (P) Purposive 1371 Nonowner: 67.1 ± 7.3 Owner: 73.5 ± 7.0 User: 73.6 ± 6.9 3 Fair
Kelly et al. 2011 USA Cross-sectional (P) Nonconsulters: Convenience Consulters: Purposive 93 Nonconsulters: 72.8 ± 4.3 Consulters: 70.6 ± 4.7 Consulters 2: 73.1 ± 6.2 4 Poor
Laplante-Lévesque et al. 2012 Australia Cross-sectional (P) Convenience 153 Median: 70.0 4 Fair
Chang et al. 2016 Taiwan Cross-sectional survey (P) Convenience 599 72.1 ± 5.8 4 Fair
Tahden et al. 2018 Germany Cross-sectional (R) N/A 211 HA nonuser: 70.6 ± 5.1 HA user: 72.1 ± 6.1 4 Fair

Note. P = Prospective; R = Retrospective; NR = Not Reported; N/A = Not Applicable; HA = Hearing aid.