Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2021 Dec 8;117(5):1416–1426. doi: 10.1111/add.15747

Table 3.

Mean and standard deviation of affect, craving, and expectancies during smoking and vaping events among dual users

Smoking Vaping OR 95% CI t-ratio df p-value
Positive Affect c 3.1 (1.3) 3.1 (1.5) 0.92 (0.67, 1.25) −0.55 2401 0.58
Negative Affect c 2.6 (1.3) 2.6 (1.6) 0.90 (0.75, 1.09) −1.09 2402 0.28
Cigarette Craving 3.8 (1.3) 3.4 (2.0) 0.24 (0.15, 0.40) −4.65 160 0.004
E-Cigarette Craving 2.6 (1.5) 3.7 (1.7) 1.19 (2.22,4.89) 5.95 160 <0.001
Positive Cigarette Expectanciesa 3.9 (1.4) 3.3 (2.0) 0.31 (0.19, 0.53) −4.41 159 <0.001
Positive E-Cigarette Expectancies b 2.7 (1.5) 3.7 (1.7) 2.30 (1.60, 3.31) 4.55 159 <0.001
Hunger c 2.9 (1.3) 2.9 (1.6) 1.07 (0.82, 1.40) 0.51 2402 0.61
Concentration c 2.2 (1.2) 2 (1.6) 0.93 (0.72, 1.19) −0.59 2383 0.55

Note.

a

Mean of 2 Likert items scored from 1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree: 1) I would enjoy having a cigarette right now; and 2) Smoking right now would help me feel better.

b

Mean of 2 Likert items scored from 1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree: 1) I would enjoy vaping right now; and 2) Vaping right now would help me feel better.

c

Models were run with random intercepts only due to failure to converge with random slopes.

All effects remain statistically significant after using the Benjamini-Hochberg approach to control for the false discovery rate.