Table 2.
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | Case 6 | Case 7 | Case 8 | Case 9 | Case 10 | Case 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type of foreign body | Glass (AC) | Metal | Stone chip | Glass (Intrastromal) | Silicon band | Gun pellets (metal) | Caterpillar hair | Caterpillar hair | Firecracker debris | Plastic sheet piece | Human hair eyelash (AC+corneal) |
ASOCT findings | AC FB with well-defined hyper-reflective borders and hypo-reflective left, anterior border of FB resting on DM with no intervening space, no posterior shadowing, and intact overlying cornea. [Fig. 1d] | Hyper-reflective triangular anterior border with total posterior shadowing, posterior edge protruding in AC, curling of DM at the site of AC penetration, hyper-reflective anterior border of protruding part in AC. [Fig. 2c] | A triangular FB with hyper-reflective anterior apex, well-defined hyper-reflective sides, and complete central shadowing, Curling of DM (arrow in Fig. 2d) at the site of DM breach. [Fig. 2d] | Intrastromal FB with an area of hypo-reflectivity surrounded by hyper-reflective, well-delineated borders with the isoechoic left, no posterior shadowing, and no breach in the endothelium. [Fig. 1e] | Deep intrastromal FB at corneoscleral limbus on the nasal side with well-delineated hyper-reflective borders and internal area of isoechoic reflectivity with complete penetration of rays. Epithelium and Descemet’s layer were intact. [Fig. 3d] | ASOCT of deep corneal FBs showed hyper-reflective anterior margins with total posterior shadowing, hyper-reflective oblique border in the AC with overhanging tissue, surrounding tissue hyper-reflectivity due to associated tissue edema, scarring and damage due to heat associated with pellets, curling of the DM at the site of AC entry. [Fig. 2e] | Three hyper-reflective fine linear structures corresponding to setae at different corneal depths with no posterior shadowing as follows (1) 144 microns at 3 o’clock (2) 144 microns a 5 o’clock (3) 567 microns at 6 o’clock resting on DM but not penetrating AC. | (1) First visit- single hyper-reflective fine linear structure corresponding to setae at 3 o’clock, anchored to DM, temporal 2/3 in the stroma, and nasal 1/3 protruding in the AC. [Fig. 4c] (2) Follow-up ASOCT showed migration of setae into AC with a small segment anchored to the cornea. [Fig. 4d] | Multiple hyper-reflective clump echoes at different depths in the cornea from sub-epithelial to a mid-stromal level corresponding to intrastromal powdery debris with partial posterior shadowing. [Fig. 3c] | Hyper-reflective horizontal structure, sub-epithelial, corresponding to the plastic sheet, with no posterior shadowing. | Multiple hyper-reflective echoes due to stromal scar and deep stromal impacted hair with a well-defined linear hyper-reflective structure in AC corresponding to the hair shaft. A hypo-echoic area suggestive of a clear space between the DM and hair shaft is seen. Curling of the DM at the site of the DM breach. [Fig. 4e] |
Approach to FB removal | Internal | Combined | Combined | External | Not removed as inert. Patient is under close observation for further stromal or AC migration of the band | Combined | Not removed and observed for setae migration and intraocular inflammation | Not removed as deep and observed for setae migration and intraocular inflammation | Not removed as inert | External under the slit lamp | Internal |
Additional measures | Nil | Three interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures as it was penetrating the wound | Two interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures | Cyno-acrylate glue+bandage contact lens | Nil | Cyno-acrylate glue+bandage contact lens | Upper tarsal conjunctival setae were removed under the slit lamp under topical anesthesia | Upper tarsal conjunctival setae were removed using a slit lamp under topical anesthesia | Nil | Nil | Nil |
FB: foreign body, DM: Descemet’s membrane, AC: anterior chamber