Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 21;15(1):e34038. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34038

Table 3. Patient's perception of the new scheduling system “Mawid” (n=421).

Statements Strongly agree, n (%) Agree, n (%) Neutral, n (%) Disagree, n (%) Strongly disagree, n (%)
 The appointment booking system regulates the number of PHCC attendees   196(46.6) 179(42.5) 33(7.8) 13(3.1) 0
The appointment booking system is suitable for all Patient 154(36.6) 142(33.7) 74(17.6) 38(9) 13(3.1)
The appointment system reduces clinic Crowding 189 (44.9) 180 (42.8) 36 (8.6) 12 (2.9) 4 (1)
The appointment booking system has increased the availability of close dates 175(41.6) 177(42) 45(10.7) 15(3.6) 9(2.1)
There is an accumulation of the number of patients despite the use of the appointment booking system 64(15.2) 114(27.1) 78(18.5) 123(29.2) 42(10)
The economic aspect   limits the use of the scheduling system (appointment)   53(12.6) 114(27.1) 109(25.9) 104(24.7) 41(9.7)
 Community culture limits the use of the scheduling system (appointment)   117(27.8) 143(34.0) 65(15.4) 76(18.1) 20(4.8)
The system provides the beneficiary access to the nearest PHCCs   230(54.6) 139(33) 38(9) 10(2.4) 4(1)
The system allows the beneficiary to book, manage, modify and cancel appointments effectively   204(48.5) 167(39.7) 37(8.8) 10(2.4) 3(0.7)
The services provided through the system meet all my needs   188(44.7) 161(38.2) 50(11.9) 17(4) 5(1.2)