Table 3.
RI-CLPM model fitting.
| Model | AR Paths | Lagged Paths | Covariances | χ2 | p | df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | Comp Model | SB χ2 | SB df | SB χ2 pval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Constrained | Constrained | Constrained | 96.82 | 0.002 | 61 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.042 | ||||
| 2 | Constrained | Constrained | Free | 90.22 | 0.003 | 57 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.042 | 1 v. 2 | 6.55 | 4 | 0.16 |
| 3 | Constrained | Free | Free | 79.98 | 0.003 | 49 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.044 | 1 v. 3 | 17.16 | 12 | 0.14 |
| 4 | Free | Constrained | Free | 81.77 | 0.002 | 49 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.045 | 1 v. 4 | 16.23 | 12 | 0.18 |
| 5 | Free | Free | Free | 67.29 | 0.006 | 41 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.044 | 1 v. 5 | 29.97 | 20 | 0.07 |
AR paths = autoregressive paths; Covariances = within age band covariances excluding age 4 (innovations); Comp Model = models being compared; SB = Satorra-Bentler. Model 1 was selected as most parsimonious as a result of non-significant SB test when compared to all other models.