Table 2.
< 1 time/week | 1–3 times/week | 4–7 times/week | > 7 times/week | P trend | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Incident diabetes, n (%)* | 630 (8.00) | 1842 (7.51) | 2909 (7.28) | 505 (6.68) | |
Model 1 | Ref. (1.00) | 1.00 (0.91–1.09) | 0.96 (0.88–1.05) | 0.87 (0.77–0.98) | 0.0407 |
p | 0.9910 | 0.3650 | 0.0199 | ||
Model 2 | Ref. (1.00) | 0.99 (0.90–1.08) | 0.94 (0.86–1.03) | 0.84 (0.75–0.95) | 0.0095 |
p | 0. 7945 | 0.1796 | 0.0044 | ||
Model 3 | Ref. (1.00) | 0.98 (0.90–1.08) | 0.92 (0.84–1.01) | 0.84 (0.74–0.94) | 0.0042 |
p | 0.7195 | 0.0632 | 0.0035 | ||
Model 4 | Ref. (1.00) | 0.97 (0.88–1.08) | 0.92 (0.83–1.02) | 0.84 (0.73–0.97) | 0.0527 |
p | 0.6100 | 0.1307 | 0.0106 |
Data are hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI). P value for trend was for the Wald statistic, the “type III” results, for the additive model from the multivariable Cox regression models. P values were from the maximum likelihood estimate analysis. Model 1, adjusted for age, sex, and study areas; Model 2, adjusted for age, sex, BMI, waist circumference; Model 3, adjusted for age, sex, BMI, waist circumference, physical activity, sedentary time, smoking and drinking status, education level, family history of diabetes, triglycerides, LDL-C and HDL-C; Model 4, further adjusted for other major dietary consumption components based on Model 3. Total n = 79,922. * as P for Mantel–Haenszel chi-square test to compare incident rate of diabetes among the four groups was 0.0013. p value was for the risk of diabetes in relation to each specific group of fruit intake, as compared to the < 1time/week