Table 4.
< 1 time/week | 1–3 times/week | 4–7 times/week | > 7 times/week | P trend | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal glucose tolerance (n = 21,679) | |||||
n. cases/participant | 65/2094 | 217/7001 | 317/10,584 | 49/2000 | |
Model 1 | Ref. (1.00) | 1.08 (0.82–1.42) | 0.97 (0.73–1.27) | 0.67 (0.46–0.97) | 0.0308 |
p | 0.6013 | 0.8000 | 0.0360 | ||
Model 2 | Ref. (1.00) | 1.14 (0.83–1.57) | 1.02 (0.74–1.42) | 0.51 (0.37–0.95) | 0.0140 |
p | 0.4191 | 0.8860 | 0.0292 | ||
Impaired glucose regulation (n = 58,243) | |||||
n. cases/participants | 565/5779 | 1625/17,521 | 2592/29,383 | 456/5560 | |
Model 1 | Ref. (1.00) | 1.00 (0.90–1.10) | 0.96 (0.87–1.05) | 0.89 (0.79–1.01) | 0.1645 |
p | 0.9750 | 0.3883 | 0.0722 | ||
Model 2 | Ref. (1.00) | 0.97 (0.87–1.08) | 0.92 (0.83–1.03) | 0.88 (0.76–1.02) | 0.2764 |
p | 0.5332 | 0.1525 | 0.0963 |
Data are hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI). P values for trend was for the Wald statistic, the “type III” results, for the additive model from the multivariable Cox regression models. Model 1, adjusted for age, sex, and study areas; Model 2, further adjusted for BMI, waist circumference, physical activity, sedentary time, smoking and drinking status, education level, family history of diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, LDL-C, HDL-C, and other major dietary consumption components, based on Model 1. p value was for the risk of diabetes in relation to each specific group of fruit intake, as compared to the < 1 time/week
Bold values descriptive for case number in each groups and need not to be compared, thus do not have P values for them