Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 20;13:2922. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29876-3

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison between puff latencies theoretically predicted with the rate of IP3 release θ = 250 μm2s−1 and observed by Dickinson et al.11. Panels (A and B) show minimal first puff latencies and mean latencies simulated with different values of the effective diffusion coefficient for IP3, DI. All points correspond to a 200 ms flash. Plain symbols are theoretical predictions while empty symbols are the experimental observations of Dickinson et al.11. Lines are drawn between simulation results. Simulations are performed in a 2D ellipse-shaped system with the spot of IP3 release being a 0.25 μm radius disk at one extremity of the simulated cell. For each theoretical point, 50 independent simulations were run. Error bars indicate ± SEM. For minimal first puffs, the 50 simulations were divided in 10 groups of 5 simulations among which the minimal first puff was considered.