Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 20;13:2968. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29895-0

Table 2.

Degradation efficiency and enzymatic activity of various microbial sources in the primary selectiona.

Source Filter paper degradation rate (cm/day) VS removal efficiency (%) Enzyme activity (IU/mL)
FPase CMCase Avicelase Xylanase
RSC 0.9 ± 0.30 51.95 ± 0.30 0.51 ± 0.25 0.02 ± 0.15 0.04 ± 0.18 0.66 ± 0.20
CM 0.6 ± 0.20 44.25 ± 0.15 0.48 ± 0.22 0.01 ± 0.25 0.02 ± 0.50 0.21 ± 0.21
GD 0.5 ± 0.15 45.85 ± 0.25 0.49 ± 0.15 0.01 ± 0.10 0.02 ± 0.20 0.16 ± 0.13
SGS 0.9 ± 0.15 50.81 ± 0.20 0.52 ± 0.10 0.02 ± 0.26 0.04 ± 0.10 0.41 ± 0.22
RF 0.5 ± 0.20 43.24 ± 0.30 0.47 ± 0.22 0.01 ± 0.25 0.04 ± 0.41 0.21 ± 0.15
TI 1.0 ± 0.10 52.46 ± 0.30 0.49 ± 0.20 0.04 ± 0.20 0.03 ± 0.55 0.52 ± 0.18

aAll the data in each microbial source was measured when the filter paper complete degradation.