Table 2.
Degradation efficiency and enzymatic activity of various microbial sources in the primary selectiona.
Source | Filter paper degradation rate (cm/day) | VS removal efficiency (%) | Enzyme activity (IU/mL) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPase | CMCase | Avicelase | Xylanase | |||
RSC | 0.9 ± 0.30 | 51.95 ± 0.30 | 0.51 ± 0.25 | 0.02 ± 0.15 | 0.04 ± 0.18 | 0.66 ± 0.20 |
CM | 0.6 ± 0.20 | 44.25 ± 0.15 | 0.48 ± 0.22 | 0.01 ± 0.25 | 0.02 ± 0.50 | 0.21 ± 0.21 |
GD | 0.5 ± 0.15 | 45.85 ± 0.25 | 0.49 ± 0.15 | 0.01 ± 0.10 | 0.02 ± 0.20 | 0.16 ± 0.13 |
SGS | 0.9 ± 0.15 | 50.81 ± 0.20 | 0.52 ± 0.10 | 0.02 ± 0.26 | 0.04 ± 0.10 | 0.41 ± 0.22 |
RF | 0.5 ± 0.20 | 43.24 ± 0.30 | 0.47 ± 0.22 | 0.01 ± 0.25 | 0.04 ± 0.41 | 0.21 ± 0.15 |
TI | 1.0 ± 0.10 | 52.46 ± 0.30 | 0.49 ± 0.20 | 0.04 ± 0.20 | 0.03 ± 0.55 | 0.52 ± 0.18 |
aAll the data in each microbial source was measured when the filter paper complete degradation.