Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 22;2023(2):CD013775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013775.pub2

1. Gender ‐ Studies undertaking multivariable regression analyses to determine the effect of gender on progression to PDR.

Study Study type Time years  N at baseline Adjustment factors Effect estimate P value Comments
          Type Value 95% CI    
Type 1 diabetes
No multivariable regression analyses
Type 2 diabetes
Nelson 1989 Prospective cohort 4 953 DM duration, age RR 1.5 0.7 to 3.4   Male vs female
Gange 2021 Retrospective cohort (electronic database) 5 718 Maximum HbA1c, gender, smoking, comorbidities, obesity, insulin use, education, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetic ketoacidosis Gender reported narratively in text as being non‐significant.  
Lee 2021 Retrospective cohort 6 2623 HbA1c, DR severity at baseline, age, BMI         Male vs female
Type 1 and type 2 diabetes
Lee 2017 Retrospective cohort (electronic database) 5 32,553 DR severity at baseline, age, ethnicity, features of DR HR 0.92a 0.71 to 1.19 0.53  
Harris 2013 Retrospective cohort (electronic database) 5 4617 HbA1c, age, ethnicity, comorbidities, medications  HR 1.08 0.94 to 1.22    
Jeng 2016 Retrospective cohort (electronic database) 5 53,453 Age, comorbidities, medications HR 0.99 0.85 to 1.15   Female vs male

BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; DM: diabetes mellitus; DR: diabetic retinopathy; HbA1c: glycated haemoglobin/haemoglobin A1c; HR: hazard ratio; NPDR: non‐proliferative diabetic retinopathy; OR: odds ratio; PDR: proliferative diabetic retinopathy; RR: risk ratio; vs: versus

a Reference gender not reported: authors contacted but unable to confirm