Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 22;2023(2):CD013775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013775.pub2

17. Proteinuria ‐ Studies undertaking multivariable regression analyses to determine the effect of proteinuria on progression to PDR.

Study Study type Time years  N at baseline Adjustment factors Effect estimate P value Comments
          Type Value 95% CI    
                   
Type 1 diabetes  
WESDR
Klein 1993
Prospective cohort 4 996 HbA1, DBP OR 2.76a
1.51b
0.99 to 7.68
0.48 to 4.77
0.05
0.48
Gross proteinuria present
Roy 2006 Prospective cohort 6 725 HbA1c, age, hypertension OR 1.00c
3.74d
 
1.52 to 9.18
 
0.01
 
WESDR
Report XVII
Prospective cohort 14 996 DR severity at baseline,  OR 1.65 1.03 to 2.64   No vs yes
 
WESDR
Report XXII
Prospective cohort 25 996 HbA1c, SBP, BMI HR 1.83 1.31 to 2.56 < 0.001 No vs yes
 
Type 2 diabetes    
WESDR
Klein 1993
Prospective cohort 4 1370 HbA1, DBP OR 0.90 0.25 to 3.32 0.88 Older‐onset group taking insulin
Gross proteinuria present
Nelson 1989 Prospective cohort 4 953 DM duration, age, sex RR 2.50 Range: 1.1 to 5.8   No vs yes
Proteinuria: urine protein‐to‐creatinine ratio ≥ 113 mg/mmol
Grauslund 2009 Prospective cohort 25 573 HbA1c, DR severity at baseline, age, sex, DBP, SBP, BMI, proteinuria, smoking, maculopathy OR 5.17 0.49 to 54.3   Proteinuria vs no proteinuria
Type 1 and 2 diabetes
Janghorbani 2000 Retrospective cohort 5 3482 HbA1c, DM duration, SBP, type of DM RR 1.00e
1.27f
 
1.05 to 1.54
 
< 0.05
 

BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; DM: diabetes mellitus; DR: diabetic retinopathy; HbA1c: glycated haemoglobin/haemoglobin A1c; HR: hazard ratio; NPDR: non‐proliferative diabetic retinopathy; OR: odds ratio; PDR: proliferative diabetic retinopathy; RR: risk ratio; SBP: systolic blood pressure; vs: versus

aNo/mild NPDR at baseline
bModerate/severe NPDR at baseline
cNo proteinuria
dOvert proteinuria
eNo proteinuria
fProteinuria