Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 22;2023(2):CD013775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013775.pub2

Harris 2013.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: registry data
Location: USA
Time period: 01 January 2001 to 31 December 2009
Outcome: PDR
Outcome measurement: incidence, means, and percentages of progressors versus non‐progressors to PDR, and HR
Participants Number of participants: 4617
Diabetes type: T1D and T2D
Inclusion criteria: new diagnosis of NPDR after first year in registry (point of baseline); aged ≥ 30 years; ≥ 2 registrations as having diagnosis of DM; continuous enrolment in registry; ≥ 1 visit to an ophthalmologist or optometrist during first year of registration and no signs of NPDR or PDR; ≥ 1 record of HbA1c following baseline date
Exclusion criteria: in registry < 1 year; not in registry continuously; any record of PDR prior to index date
Notes Link to data extraction table, risk of bias assessment, and results:
osf.io/t52qu/?view_only=37b711fa179d4b249d9d16c430ec169e
 
Item Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Study participation Unclear See ‘Notes’ above for link to risk of bias assessment
Study attrition No See ‘Notes’ above for link to risk of bias assessment
Prognostic factor measurement Unclear See ‘Notes’ above for link to risk of bias assessment
Outcome measurement Unclear See ‘Notes’ above for link to risk of bias assessment
Adjustment for other prognostic factors Unclear See ‘Notes’ above for link to risk of bias assessment
Statistical analysis and reporting Unclear See ‘Notes’ above for link to risk of bias assessment