Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 21;28(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s40519-023-01552-5

Table 2.

Variables affecting type 2 diabetes self-management scores

Variables Type 2 diabetes self-management scores
Total (n = 373) Men (n = 172) Women (n = 201)
Education status
 Literate* 64.3 ± 17.3 76.7 ± 7.2 62.5 ± 17.7
 Primary school 61.4 ± 5.5a,b 58.4 ± 16.2c,d 63.2 ± 14.8
 Secondary school 68.3 ± 17.7a 68.8 ± 18.4c 67.7 ± 17.2
 High school 67.0 ± 6.7 65.7 ± 17.7 69.6 ± 14.6
 Bachelor 73.3 ± 12.0b 75.5 ± 12.7d 70.7 ± 11.0
 Postgraduate education* 79.0 ± 14.1 79.0 ± 17.3 79
Comorbidities
 Yes 64.1 ± 16.0a 63.8 ± 17.8b 64.3 ± 14.6c
 No 71.2 ± 16.7a 71.4 ± 15.8b 71.0 ± 18.0c
Presence of diabetes complications
 Yes 62.4 ± 17.1a 61.8 ± 18.4b 63.2 ± 15.6
 No 67.8 ± 15.5a 69.7 ± 15.8b 66.6 ± 15.2
Diabetes treatment method
 Oral antidiabetic 66.0 ± 15.6a,b 69.5 ± 16.7f 63.7 ± 14.4g,h
 Insulin 58.2 ± 16.0a,c,d 56.8 ± 15.7f,k 59.9 ± 16.2m,n
 *Diet only 66.4 ± 20.9 68.5 ± 23.6 63.4 ± 18.7
 Diet and physical activity only 78.3 ± 11.7b,c,e 77.3 ± 10.8k 79.9 ± 13.4g,m
 Combined medical therapy 69.6 ± 14.0d,e 64.8 ± 18.7 71.6 ± 11.2h,n
Dieting
 Yes 75.6 ± 12.5a 76.8 ± 12.1b 74.5 ± 12.9c
 No 58.9 ± 15.2a 57.9 ± 16.6b 59.7 ± 14.0c
BMI classification
 *Underweight 49.0 ± 8.6 49.0 ± 8.6
 Normal 67.7 ± 18.4c 68.2 ± 17.8 67.2 ± 19.2
 Overweight 67.6 ± 16.1a 67.5 ± 16.7b 67.9 ± 15.2
 Obese 61.8 ± 14.6a,c 57.7 ± 17.7b 63.3 ± 13.1

Within each variable, there are significant differences between groups with the same letter. Mann–Whitney U analysis was used for two group comparisons and Kruskal–Wallis analysis was applied for multiple groups. Bonferroni correction was made

*The number of subjects in the literate, postgraduate, underweight, and diet therapy only groups was too small, so they were not included in the analysis