Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 8;13:1041391. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041391

Table 4.

Studies 3–11: LWA effects for both whole-sample and within-group (Liberals-only).

Whole-sample LWA Liberals-only LWA
Perceived ecological threat (Study 3) 0.15*** 0.10***
COVID threat sensitivity (Studies 4) 0.15** 0.09
Desired restriction (Study 4) 0.16** 0.13*
Desired punishment (Studies 4) 0.23*** 0.09^
Belief in a dangerous world (Study 5) 0.42*** 0.64***
Trump threat sensitivity (Study 6) 0.18*** 0.25**
Restrictive communication norms (Study 7) 0.19*** 0.08
Negative views/African Americans (Study 8)a 0.50*** 0.54***
Negative Views/African Americans (Study 9)a 0.58*** 0.67***
Negative views/Jews (Study 8)a 0.42*** 0.37***
Negative views/Jews (Study 9)a 0.39** 0.47**
Dogmatism (Study 10a) 0.29*** 0.39***
Dogmatism (Study 10b) 0.42*** 0.40***
Modern racism/Relig. minorities (Study 10a) 0.53*** 0.60***
Modern racism/Relig. minorities (Study 10b) 0.62*** 0.64***
Attitude strength (Study 10a) 0.09 0.39***
Attitude strength (Study 10b) 0.06 0.41***
Dogmatism (Study 11) 0.21*** 0.29***
Need for closure (Study 11) 0.23*** 0.11^
AVERAGE EFFECT SIZE 0.30 *** 0.35 ***

All metrics = standardized betas. Across-Group LWA correlations always control for political ideology (every study) + any available demographic factors. aReverse-scored and re-named so that positive correlations always equal the conceptually-expected direction for LWA.

***

p < = 0.001;

**

p < = 0.01;

*

p < = 0.05;

^

p < = 0.15.