Table 5.
Facilitators and challenges the PA interventionist reported in implementing the support program
| Facilitators | |
| Patient level | |
| Patient receptivity | Patients were receptive and appreciative of post-trauma hospitalization follow-up. |
| Provider level | |
| Use of provider delegates | Ability to deliver intervention to PCP delegates provided the opportunity to reach PCPs indirectly. |
| Provider/delegate receptivity | Providers and their delegates were generally receptive to the intervention. |
| Challenges | |
| Patient level | |
| COVID-19 |
|
| PA availability | PA was not available 24/7, so often did not reach patient prior to discharge. Reaching patients after discharge could be challenging. |
| Many patients did not plan to follow-up with PCP. |
|
| Provider level | |
| COVID-19 | Providers were less available for the intervention due to factors such as the busyness of COVID-19, abbreviated hours, reduced staff. |
| PA availability | The PA interventionist was not always available and could miss provider call back for consultation. |
| Providers hard to reach | There was often no provider back line, or the provider had left the practice. |
| PA concerns |
|
OUD, opioid use disorder; PA, physician assistant; PCP, primary care provider.