Table 1.
O for p or t | Author 1 | Study Design 2 | p 3 | t 3 | Intervention | Outcome Measures | Result/Clinical Experience (CE) 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phytotherapy | Arslan et al. 2020 [17] | RCT (n = 60) | √ | - | Henna application | CIPN assessment tool | Significant beneficial effect. Low cost, safe intervention, and well tolerated by patients. |
Fallon et al. 2015 in S3 clinical guideline Supportive therapy [37] |
Proof of concept study | - | √ | Application of menthol crème 1% | Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Quantitative Sensory Testing | Significant reduction in pain symptoms. | |
Izgu et al. 2019 [101] | Pilot RCT (n = 46) | - | √ | Aroma hand and foot massage. | Neuropathic symptoms, numeric rating scale | Significant lower severity of pain based on NRS. | |
Li et al. 2019 [35] | Meta-analysis | √ | √ | All types of Chinese herbal medicine in TCM | CIPN grade, Levi’s grade | Improvement of sensory nerve conduction velocity and motor nerve conduction velocity. | |
Noh et al. 2018 [36] | Syst. Review of RCTs (n = 28) | √ | √ | All types of Phy used for medicinal purposes | Clinical improvement, nerve conduction study (NCS) | Potentially preventive and/or therapeutic effects for CIPN | |
Noh and Park 2019 [50] | RCT (n = 31) | - | √ | Aroma foot reflexology | CIPN assessment tool | Statistically significant reduction of symptoms. | |
Rostami et al. 2019 [75] | RCT (n = 34) | - | √ | Topical c. colocynthis oil | Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT), Neurotoxicity score | Failed to improve the symptoms of CIPN compared with placebo. | |
Consensus process | N/A | √ | √ | Aconit oil application | Clinical improvement | CE 3 | |
Consensus process | N/A | √ | Solum oil application | Clinical improvement | CE 1 | ||
Consensus process | N/A | √ | √ | Flaxseed bath | Clinical improvement | CE 4 | |
Consensus process | N/A | √ | √ | Arnica comp/Formica oil application | Clinical improvement | CE 3 | |
Consensus process | N/A | - | √ | Arnica comp/Formica ointment (for stronger effect of Aconit) | Clinical improvement | CE 3–4 | |
Consensus process | N/A | - | √ | Rosemary ointment | Clinical improvement | CE 3–4 | |
Consensus process | N/A | - | √ | Peppermint oil application for heat sensations and paraesthesia | Clinical improvement | CE2 | |
Consensus process | N/A | - | √ | Eucalyptus oil application for heat sensations and paraesthesia | Clinical improvement | CE 2 | |
Movement therapies | Andersen et al. 2020 [38] | Single-blind ex-ploratory RCT (n = 48) | √ | √ | Physical therapy | Patient questionnaires, quantitative sensory testing | Improvement of CIPN pain for patients with breast cancer. Correlation to preservation of sensory function. |
Brami et al. 2016 [16] | Systematic review of RCTs (n = 13) | - | √ | Physical activity | Nerve conduction velocity, (NCV), Neurological Symptom Score, Total Neuropathy Score, QoL | Evidence was reported for interventions consisting of physical activity components; for strength and endurance training; and for multimodal self-help strategies including physical activity, yoga, and mindfulness. | |
Fernandes and Kumar 2016 [69] | Single-group pre-post prospective study (n = 25) | - | √ | Closed kinematic chain exercise | Modified Total Neuropathy Score (mTNS), Berg Balance Score (BBS) | Significant change in values before and after the exercise. | |
Kanzawa-Lee et al. 2020 [54] | Comprehensive inte-grative review(7 RCTs, 6 quasi-experimental studies) | - | √ | Exercise with Aerobic, strength training, and balance training | CIPN, balance, and fitness | Empirical evidence is insufficient to definitively conclude that exercise interventions ameliorate CIPN. | |
Kleckner et al. 2018 [48] | Secondary analysis of a phase III RCT (n = 355) | - | √ | EXCAP©® a standardized, individualized, moderate-intensity, home-based, six-week progressive walking and resistance exercise program | Patient-reported CIPN symptoms | Reduction of CIPN symptoms (hot/coldness in hands/feet, numbness, and tingling). | |
McCrary et al. 2019 [84] | Prospective pilot intervention study, single group pre-post design (n = 35) | - | √ | 8-week multimodal exercises (resistance, balance, cardiovascular training) | Total Neuropathy Score—clinical version (TNSc), EORTC CIPN-20, functional assessment tools, disability, and QoL | Reduction of CIPN symptoms and related functional and quality of life deficits. No changes in sensory or motor neurophysiologic parameters. | |
Schönsteiner et al. 2017 [89] | Randomized exploratory phase 2 study (n = 131) | - | √ | Whole-body vibration including massage, passive mobilization, and physical exercise. | Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale (FACT/GOG-NTX), EORTC QLQ-C30 Quantitative sensory testing (QST) |
Significantly and clinically relevant beneficial impact on symptom relief, physical fitness, and sensory function. | |
Schwenk et al. 2016 [90] | Single blinded, randomized controlled pilot study (n = 22) | - | √ | Interactive motor adaptation balance training program | VPT score, numeric rating scale for pain (NRS), neuropathy-related numbness in feet (NRS score), Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), Falls, Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) | Significant reductions in postural sway parameters in challenging semi-tandem position. No significant changes were noted for balance with “eyes closed”, gait speed, and fear of falling. |
|
Steinmann et al. 2011 in S3 clinical guidelineS3 Guideline Supportive therapy 2020 [37] | Overview article | √ | √ | Tactile Stimulation (e.g., been bath) | Clinical improvement | 81% of patients consider tactile stimulation to be very effective or effective. | |
Streckmann, Kneis et al. 2014 in S3 Guideline Supportive therapy 2020 [37] |
RCT (n = 62) | - | √ | Exercise (sensorimotor training, endurance, strength) | QOL; coordination, endurance, strength, therapy-induced side-effects. |
Due to the highly significant physiological parameters, the study was terminated prematurely. | |
Streckmann, Zopf et al. 2014 [60] | Systematic review of RCTs (n = 10), CCT (n = 8) | - | √ | Exercise interventions | Side effects of Polyneuropathy | Number of patients with reduced deep sensitivity could be diminished. Only one RCT related to CIPN. | |
S3 Guideline Supportive therapy 2020 [37] | S3 Guideline | - | √ | Non-drug methods | Not described | Sensorimotor training and whole-body vibration represent new options for CIPN treatment. Clear evidence of improvement of functional limitation through non-medicinal procedures such as sports therapy, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and physical therapy including electrotherapy. |
|
Tofthagen et al. 2012 [96] | Review of RCTs (n = 10), single-arm study (n = 1), cross-over-study (n = 1), quasi-experimental study (n = 1) | - | √ | Strength training and balance training | Neuropathy symptoms, strength, balance | Recommendation of physical therapy as a treatment option, but no studies were identified that evaluate strength training and balance training for treatment of CIPN. | |
Zimmer et al. 2018 [94] | RCT (n = 30) | - | √ | Multimodal exercise program, (endurance, resistance, balance, coordination) | Trial Outcome Index (TOI),NCI-CTC/FACT/GOG-NTX | Regarding CIPN (TOI), there were significant differences between groups in the main analysis. | |
Consensus process | N/A | - | √ | Sugar oil peeling | Clinical improvement | CE 3 | |
Consensus process | N/A | √ | √ | Tactile stimulation | Clinical improvement | CE 2–3 | |
Mind-body therapies | Brami et al. 2016 [16] | Systematic review of RCTs (n = 13) | - | √ | Mind-Body modalities | NCV, Neurological Symptom Score, Total Neuropathy Score, QoL | Evidence was reported for self-management strategies including yoga and mindfulness. |
Galantino et al. 2019 [80] | Open-label, single-arm, feasibility trial | - | √ | Yoga, Meditation | Functional Reach, Timed Up and Go, Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ), (FACT-GOG-NTX) |
Significant improvements were found in flexibility, balance, and fall risk. | |
Kanzawa-Lee et al. 2020 [54] | Comprehensive inte-grative review(7 RCTs, 6 quasi-experimental studies) | - | √ | Yoga, exercises | CIPN, balance, and fitness | Empirical evidence is insufficient to definitively conclude that exercise interventions ameliorate CIPN. | |
Nutritional therapy | Brami et al. 2016 [16] | Systematic review of RCTs (n = 13) | √ | √ | Glutamine, Goshajinkigan, vitamin E, Omega 3, Acetyl-l-carnitine, Alpha-lipoic-acid | NCV, Neurological Symptom Score, Total Neuropathy Score, QoL | Vitamin E, Glutamine, Goshajinkigan, and Omega-3 may prevent CIPN. Acetyl-l-carnitine may worsen CIPN; Alpha-lipoic-acid activity is unknown. |
Greenlee et al. 2017 [42] | Clinical practice guideline based on a systematic literature review of RCTs. | √ | √ | Omega-3, fatty acids, vitamin E, alpha-lipoic acid, dietary modification | - | Acetyl-l carnitine is not recommended to prevent CIPN. Insufficient evidence that Omega-3, fatty acids, and vitamin E help to reduce neuropathy. | |
Rostock et al. 2013 [88] | Four arm RCT (n = 60) | - | √ | Vitamin B complex | Detailed questionnaire, NRS | Positive effects. No statistically significant results. | |
Hydrotherapy | Consensus process | N/A | - | √ | Alkaline bath for hand/foot, then Aconit oil application | Clinical improvement | CE 3 |
Consensus process | N/A | - | √ | Cold knee and/or arm showers | Clinical improvement | CE 3 | |
Acupuncture/Acupressure | Brami et al. 2016 [16] | Systematic review of RCTs (n = 13) | - | √ | Electroacupuncture | NCV, Neurological Symptom Score, Total Neuropathy Score, QoL | Not superior to placebo. |
Deng et al. 2013 [53] | Systematic review of meta-analyses (n = 4), syst. Reviews (n = 14), RCT (n = 16) | - | √ | Acupuncture | VAS, neuropathy symptoms, QoL. | Some improvement regarding VAS and neuropathy symptoms. | |
Donald et al. 2011 [68] | Retrospective Evaluation (n = 18) |
- | √ | Acupuncture | CIPN symptoms. | 82% (n = 14) reported improvement of neuropathy symptoms. | |
Greenlee et al. 2017 [42] | Clinical practice guideline based on a systematic literature review of RCTs. | √ | √ | Acupuncture, electroacupuncture | - | Insufficient evidence that electroacupuncture help to reduce neuropathy. | |
Rostock et al. 2013 [88] | Four arm RCT (n = 60) | - | √ | Electroacupuncture | Detailed questionnaire, NRS Scale | Positive effects. No statistically significant results. | |
S3 guideline complementary medicine in the treatment of oncology patients [57] | S3 guideline | - | √ | Acupuncture, electroacupuncture | BPI, Total Neuropathy Score, NCS, Functional Assessment, QoL. | Data are available from a meta-analysis and two RCTs on the efficacy of A- for CIPN. | |
Wong et al. 2016 [93] | Prospective phase 2 study (n = 40) | - | √ | Acupuncture like TENS | Numbness score, mTNS, Edmonton Symptoms Assessment Scale (ESAS) | Statistically significant difference at 6 months from the baseline pain score. | |
Cryotherapy | Bandla et al. 2020 [18] | Proof-of-concept study (n = 26) | √ | - | Cryocompression | Total neuropathy score (TNS), NCS | Potentially improve efficacy of preventing CIPN. Safe and tolerable. |
Beijers et al. 2020 [39] | RCT (n = 180) | √ | - | Frozen glove and sock | CIPN20 | Significant reduction of CIPN symptoms. Dropout of one-third of patients. | |
Griffiths et al. 2018 [19] | RCT (n = 29) | √ | - | Frozen glove and sock | Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory, BPI. | No significant differences in neuropathy or pain. Drop-out rate, more than 50 %. | |
Sundar et al. 2017 [40] | Prospective pilot study (n = 20) | √ | - | Continuous-flow limb hypothermia. | Visual analog scale (VAS), subjective tolerance scale, NCS, |
No significant difference in NCS. Well tolerated by all patients. | |
Consensus process | N/A | √ | - | Frozen gloves and socks | Clinical improvement | Cannot be assessed. | |
Manipulative therapies | Brami et al. 2016 [16] | Systematic review of RCTs (n = 13)) | - | √ | Massage, touch therapy | MD Anderson Symptom Inventory | Greatly reduced CIPN symptoms from grade 2 to 1 and significantly improved quality of life. |
Cunningham et al. 2011 [74] | Case report | - | √ | Massage | MD Anderson Symptom Inventory | Greatly reduced CIPN symptoms from grade 2 to 1 and significantly improved quality of life. | |
Izgu et al. 2019 [41] | RCT (n = 40) | √ | Massage | Self-Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Sign (S-LANSS), EORCT QLQ CIPN20, NCS. | Massage successfully prevented CIPN, improved the QoL, and showed beneficial effects on the NCS findings. | ||
Sarisoy, et al. 2020 [76] | RCT (n = 40) | - | √ | Foot-massage | VAS, Doleur Neuropatique/Neuropatic pain (DN4), Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) | Positive effect on CIPN pain. | |
Schönsteiner et al. 2017 [89] | Randomized exploratory phase 2 study (n = 131) | - | √ | Whole-body vibration including massage, passive mobilization, and physical exercise. | (FACT/GOG-NTX), EORTC QLQ-C30 Quantitative sensory testing (QST) |
Significantly and clinically relevant beneficial impact on symptoms relieve, physical fitness, and sensory function. | |
Rhytmical embrocations | Consensus process | N/A | - | √ | Aconit oil—rhythmical embrocation | Clinical improvement | CE 4 |
Consensus process | N/A | - | √ | Arnica comp/Formica oil—rhythmical embrocation | Clinical improvement | CE 4 | |
TENS/Scrambler therapy | Coyne et al. 2013 [67] | Expanded trial, single arm trial (n = 39) | - | √ | Scrambler therapy | NRS, BPI, European Organization for Treatment and Cancer CIPN20 (EORTCCIPN20) | Clinically important and statistically significant improvements were seen in average, least, and worst pain. |
Gewandter et al. 2019 [65] | Single-arm study (n = 29) | - | √ | TENS | EORTC-CIPN20, Utah Early Neuropathy Score | Significant improvements were observed with the EORTC-CIPN20. | |
Loprinzi et al. 2020 [71] | RCT, two arm phase II pilot trial (n = 50). | - | √ | Scrambler therapy, TENS | EORTC CIPN20, NAS questionnaire regarding CIPN-associated pain | Scrambler therapy improves CIPN symptoms more than TENS. | |
Other supportive interventions | Kotani et al. 2021 [43] | Double-blind phase 2 trial (n = 56) | √ | - | Compression | Incidence of Grade ≥ 2 CIPN. | No significant reduction of CIPN incidence. |
Rostock et al. 2013 [88] | Four arm RCT (n = 60) | - | √ | Hydroelectric bath | Detailed questionnaire, NRS | Positive effects. No statistically significant results. | |
Consensus process | N/A | √ | - | Compression | Clinical improvement | Cannot be assessed. | |
Consensus process | N/A | - | √ | Copper ointment (0.4%) | Clinical improvement | E 2 |
Legend. 1 The number in brackets refer to the comprehensive reference list (see full article). 2 N/A: not applicable. 3 √: meets criteria; -: does not meet criteria, 4 CE = Clinical experience (rated on a numerical scale 0 to 5 with 0 = no effect and 5 = maximum effect.