Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 10;17:100599. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100599

Table 3.

Quantitative analysis results of phenolic compounds in different varieties of pea (µg/g).h

Variety Coumaric acid Malic acid Protocatechuic acid rosemary acid pomelo peel
JSP 1.15 ± 0.03d 56.62 ± 0.09d 10.87 ± 0.22d ndi ndi
ZW.9 0.52 ± 0.03c 28.28 ± 0.37b 2.94 ± 0.04a ndi ndi
DMP nd 33.95 ± 1.56b 5.57 ± 0.15b ndi ndi
XMP 0.08 ± 0.01a nd 11.51 ± 0.29d ndi ndi
ZSHP 3.40 ± 0.07g 42.66 ± 0.10c 16.64 ± 0.60f 0.09 ± 0.00a ndi
HL604 0.61 ± 0.01c 36.76 ± 2.34b 14.62 ± 1.34e ndi 0.17 ± 0.03a
ZW.8 3.00 ± 0.05f 27.48 ± 0.32b 8.26 ± 0.06c ndi ndi
ZW.6 0.16 ± 0.04ab 17.25 ± 0.17a nd ndi ndi
HMP 0.21 ± 0.04b nd 2.63 ± 0.05a 0.09 ± 0.01a ndi
CSRP 1.34 ± 0.07e 47.68 ± 0.39cd 3.52 ± 0.08a ndi ndi

a-f Indicates that there are significant differences between different pea varieties with the same in (p < 0.05).

h Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3).

I nd, not detected or lower than limit of quantification.