. 2023 Jan 5;47(1):13–25. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000197

Table 2.

International Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics lower-limb Consensus Outcome Measures for Prosthetic and Amputation Services.

	Name of outcome measure	Time (min)	Languages currently available in (other than English)	Chapter level ICF categories in order as ranked by consensus participants (left considered most important)												Not in ICF
	Name of outcome measure	Time (min)	Languages currently available in (other than English)	Mobility (d4)	Sensory functions and pain (b2)	Self-care (d5)	General tasks and demands (d2)	Functions of the skin and related structures (b8)	Domestic life (d6)	Community, social, and civil life (d9)	Major life areas (d8)	Products and technology (e1)	Mental functions (b1)	Interpersonal interactions and relationships (d7)	Support and relationships (e3)	Socket comfort	Satisfaction with prosthesis	Donning and doffing
PerfOMs	AMP	10–15	1	×	×							×
	TUG	1–2	—	×
	2MWT	<5	—	×
	Total time	16 min
PROMs	PEQ-residual limb health	<5	5			×		×
	TAPES-R	15	3	×	×		×			×	×	×		×	×	×	×
	PEQ-utility	<5	5			×						×				×	×	×
	Total time	<25 min
High-activity PerfOMs	CHAMP	15	—	×
	6MWT	<10	—	×
	Total time	25 min
Generic HRQoL	EQ-5D-5L	<5	130	×	×	×			×	×	×		×
	PROMIS-29®	<5	48	×	×		×		×	×			×	×	×
	Total time	<10 min
Generic	PSFS	5–10	5

Abbreviations: 2MWT, Two-Minute Walk Test; 6MWT, Six-Minute Walk Test; AMP, Amputee Mobility Predictor; CHAMP, Comprehensive High-Level Activity Mobility Predictor; EQ, European Quality of Life; HRQoL, health-related quality of life; ICF, International Classification of Function; PEQ, Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire; PerfOM, performance-based outcome measure; PROM, patient-reported outcome measure; PROMIS-29, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 item; PSFS, Patient-Specific Function Scale; TAPES-R, Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised; TUG, Timed Up and Go.

Texts in bold indicate outcome measure voted “Include (≥70%)” at the conclusion of the second virtual consensus meeting. Texts in italic indicate outcome measure voted “Yet to reach consensus (31%–69%)” at the conclusion of the second virtual consensus meeting.