Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 21;23:106. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03799-0

Table 2.

Characteristics of the participants

Characteristic Overall, N = 207 Men, N = 81 Women, N = 126 p-value
Age 76.7 (74.1 to 79.9) 77.4 (74.8 to 80.4) 76.3 (73.3 to 79.4) 0.072
Level of education
No studies 30 (14%) 12 (15%) 18 (14%) 0.598
Primary 107 (52%) 38 (47%) 69 (55%)
Secondary 46 (22%) 19 (23%) 27 (21%)
University 24 (12%) 12 (15%) 12 (9.5%)
Perceived health
Very good 31 (16%) 12 (16%) 19 (15%) 0.747
Good 100 (50%) 41 (54%) 59 (48%)
Fair 51 (26%) 18 (24%) 33 (27%)
Bad 13 (6.5%) 3 (3.9%) 10 (8.1%)
Very bad 4 (2.0%) 2 (2.6%) 2 (1.6%)
Unknown 8 5 3
Number of health problems 4.00 (2.00 to 5.00) 3.00 (2.00 to 5.00) 4.00 (2.00 to 6.00) 0.246
Charlson index 1.00 (0.00 to 2.00) 1.00 (0.00 to 2.00) 1.00 (0.00 to 1.00) 0.008
LSNS score 38 (31 to 45) 38 (31 to 44) 38 (31 to 45) 0.838
Unknown 6 4 2
Social isolation risk
Low 153 (76%) 58 (75%) 95 (77%) 0.960
Moderate 23 (11%) 10 (13%) 13 (10%)
High 17 (8.5%) 6 (7.8%) 11 (8.9%)
Isolated 8 (4.0%) 3 (3.9%) 5 (4.0%)
Unknown 6 4 2
JGLS score 2.00 (0.00 to 3.00) 2.00 (0.00 to 3.00) 2.00 (0.00 to 4.00) 0.723
Unknown 6 4 2
Degree of loneliness
Does not have any 127 (63%) 48 (62%) 79 (64%) 0.935
Moderate 70 (35%) 28 (36%) 42 (34%)
Severe 3 (1.5%) 1 (1.3%) 2 (1.6%)
Very severe 1 (0.5%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.8%)
Unknown 6 4 2

Continuous values expressed as median an interquartile rank. LSNS Lubben Social Network Scale, JGLS De Jong Gierveld loneliness scale