Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Radiol. 2023 Jan 17;160:110705. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110705

Table 2.

Mean values with SD for LAV and LAEF parameters as calculated by the biplane and 3D methods.

Analysis of Differences between methods Agreement between methods
Parameter Biplane 3D p-value % diff Bias (95% CI) LoA
LAV max (mL) 58.18 ± 23.87 67.10 ± 21.28 <0.001 14.24 −9.38 (−11.65, −7.10) −37.49, 18.73
LAV min (mL) 26.68 ± 19.66 34.62 ± 17.77 <0.001 25.90 −8.35 (−9.85, −6.84) −26.91, 10.21
LAV preA (mL) 45.93 ± 19.15 56.32 ± 17.00 <0.001 20.32 −10.27 (−12.20, −8.33) −33.48, 12.95
LAEF total (%) 56.71 ± 12.31 49.51 ± 11.15 <0.001 13.56 7.22 (6.00, 8.45) −7.91, 22.35
LAEF active (%) 47.60 ± 11.48 41.23 ± 10.56 <0.001 14.34 6.08 (4.59, 7.56) −11.70, 23.85
LAEF passive (%) 20.14 ± 7.95 15.29 ± 7.73 <0.001 27.38 4.51 (2.82, 5.52) −9.54, 18.56

LoA = Limits of Agreement. % diff = percentage difference. CI = confidence interval.