Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 16;21(3):549–559. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13970

Table 3.

Neutralizing synergy of p11D7 with plant‐made tixagevimab and cilgavimab at IC25 concentrations against the B.1.1.529 variant

mAb Combination Observed Neutralization (%) HSA Predicted Neutralization (%) Loewe Predicted Neutralization (%)
p11D7 + tixagevimab 43.96 ± 9.59 18.84 ± 3.96 26.08 ± 4.84
p11D7 + cilgavimab 34.76 ± 27.73 29.18 ± 14.99 48.90 ± 1.98
tixagevimab + cilgavimab 65.03 ± 2.62 35.14 ± 9.02 38.33 ± 7.02
p11D7 + tixagevimab + cilgavimab 93.92 ± 1.88 35.14 ± 9.02 50.45 ± 7.46

FFA data for each individual and combination of mAbs were performed at the IC25 and per cent neutralization was analysed with the highest single agent (HSA) and Loewe models in SynergyFinder.org. Predicted values represent the expected per cent neutralization if no synergy between mAbs was occurring, while the observed per cent neutralization was the empirically determined value of the combination at the IC25. An observed value higher than a predicted value is inferred to have synergetic interaction. At least two independent experiments with technical triplets were performed with SD values presented.