Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 22;18(2):e0280738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280738

Table 1. Fit statistics from CFA comparison.

Models χ 2 /df CFI RMSEA SRMR Δχ2 Δdf
Three-factor model 124.35/100 .94 .07 .07
    Model Aa 197.52/102 .77 .13 .10 73.17*** 2
    Model Bb 174.83/102 .82 .11 .12 50.48*** 3
    Model Cc (Harman’s Single Factor Test) 305.33/107 .52 .18 .23 181.09*** 7

Notes: N = 59

***p < .001; χ2 = chi-square discrepancy, df = degrees of freedom; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR = Standardized Root Mean Square Residual; Δχ2 = difference in chi-square, Δdf = difference in degrees of freedom. All models are compared to the three-factor model.

a = Bonding capital and team performance combined into a single factor.

b = Bonding capital and client involvement into a single factor.

c = All factors combined into a single factor.