. 2023 Feb 22;18(2):e0280738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280738

Table 3. Results of regression.

	Team Performance			Individual Member Idea Creativity
Variables	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4	Model 5	Model 6
Team Level
Team size	.17	.09	.09	.06	-.01	.04
Percentage of female members (%)	-.02	.08	.03	-.25	-.01	-.07
Client involvement		.38^**	.32^*		.35^*	.20
Team bonding capital			.40^***			.04
Client involvement ^* team bonding capital			.24^*			.33^*
Individual Level
Gender				.03	.03	.04
Grades				.20^*	.22^*	.08
Tenure with manager				.24^*	.22^*	.22^*
R ²	.01	.12	.32	.01	.12	.20

Note: N = 58 at team level and 154 at individual level (Listwise). Standardized coefficients were reported

*** p < .001

** p < .01

* p < .05