Table 2. Number of spines analyzed for contacts.
Figure | Condition | Total number of mice | Number of male mice | Number of female mice |
---|---|---|---|---|
Figure 1d | Anesthesia | 6 | 4 | 2 |
Figure 1d | Awake | 6 | 4 | 2 |
Figure 1d | TTX | 4 | 3 | 1 |
Figure 1, Figure 1—figure supplement 1e | Ca2+, CA1, An vs. Aw | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Figure 2k | CA3, hM4D(Gi) | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Figure 2l | CA3, hM3D(Gq) | 4 | 1 | 3 |
Figure 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 1g | CA1 + CA3, hM4D(Gi) | 5 | 2 | 3 |
Figure 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 2g | CA3, Ca2+, hM3D(Gq) | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Figure 3c–f | Structural plasticity, An vs. Aw | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Figure 3, Figure 3—figure supplement 1 | Cluster | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Figure 4i–l | Microglial contact rates | 4 | 2 | 2 |