Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 9;614(7949):670–675. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05674-1

Extended Data Fig. 3. Example extracted stellar spectra from different reduction pipelines.

Extended Data Fig. 3

The insets highlight the peak of the spectra. The supreme-SPOON spectra are scaled by a factor of 72 to compare the overall shape of the spectra, rather than the extracted flux counts. a, The extracted stellar spectra from order 1. All pipelines are in relatively good agreement, whereas the shape of the iraclis data changes slightly at λ < 1.1 μm. This is probably owing to different traces that were used in the spectral extraction routine. b, The extracted stellar spectra from order 2. Differences at λ = 0.725 and 0.860 μm are because of differences in removing zeroth-order contaminants in the background. The iraclis pipeline does not extract data past λ > 0.85 μm, which is where the order overlap region begins. Across all pipelines, the shape of the spectra, as well as overall absorption features, cosmic-ray-removal techniques and noise levels are consistent. (https://github.com/afeinstein20/wasp39b_niriss_paper/blob/main/scripts/edfigure3.py).