Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 3.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Apr 3;32(4):505–515. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0601

Table 3.

Adjusted hazard ratios of lung cancer incidence by three levels of antibodies to 18 oral bacteria in 4263 participants in ARIC a

Bacterium Lung cancer cases/Person-Years Median concentration (ng/mL) Model 1 HR (95% CI) b Model 2 HR (95% CI) c P trend d

A. actinomycetemcomitans
 Group 1 (lowest) 20/12587 9.7 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.13
 Group 2 41/25534 50.6 0.94 (0.55–1.60) 0.94 (0.55–1.58)
 Group 3 (highest) 57/25200 212.7 1.28 (0.76–2.15) 1.28 (0.78–2.12)
A. viscosus
 Group 1 (lowest) 68/34054 2.3 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.89
 Group 2 25/14492 41.9 0.89 (0.56–1.40) 0.80 (0.50–1.28)
 Group 3 (highest) 25/14776 211.2 0.84 (0.53–1.34) 0.95 (0.60–1.50)
C. ochracea
 Group 1 (lowest) 66/34502 5.7 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.87
 Group 2 24/14609 30.9 0.81 (0.51–1.30) 0.95 (0.60–1.51)
 Group 3 (highest) 28/14210 80.1 0.95 (0.60–1.48) 0.97 (0.62–1.51)
C. rectus
 Group 1 (lowest) 73/39566 4.5 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.34
 Group 2 28/12013 30.7 1.16 (0.75–1.81) 1.21 (0.78–1.89)
 Group 3 (highest) 17/11742 87.1 0.70 (0.41–1.20) 0.74 (0.43–1.28)
E. corrodens
 Group 1 (lowest) 83/47298 3.4 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.46
 Group 2 15/7918 26.6 1.01 (0.58–1.75) 1.03 (0.58–1.82)
 Group 3 (highest) 20/8104 65.8 1.25 (0.76–2.05) 1.21 (0.74–2.00)
F. nucleatum
 Group 1 (lowest) 89/48792 3.0 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.83
 Group 2 13/7287 26.9 0.92 (0.51–1.65) 0.99 (0.55–1.80)
 Group 3 (highest) 16/7243 65.6 1.11 (0.65–1.90) 1.07 (0.62–1.84)
H. pylori
 Group 1 (lowest) 70/39859 3.3 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.48
 Group 2 18/11883 32.0 0.79 (0.47–1.32) 0.72 (0.42–1.22)
 Group 3 (highest) 30/11579 118.6 1.39 (0.90–2.16) 1.15 (0.74–1.79)
P. gingivalis
 Group 1 (lowest) 71/38613 5.7 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.50
 Group 2 31/12447 35.6 1.29 (0.84–1.98) 1.05 (0.67–1.64)
 Group 3 (highest) 16/12261 193.2 0.67 (0.38–1.18) 0.83 (0.47–1.45)
P. intermedia
 Group 1 (lowest) 42/25392 6.6 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.48
 Group 2 37/19038 38.3 1.11 (0.71–1.74) 1.25 (0.80–1.95)
 Group 3 (highest) 39/18892 156.0 1.14 (0.73–1.78) 1.22 (0.78–1.91)
P. micra
 Group 1 (lowest) 30/18551 7.5 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.78
 Group 2 32/22603 41.6 0.84 (0.51–1.39) 0.85 (0.52–1.40)
 Group 3 (highest) 56/22167 169.6 1.44 (0.92–2.25) 0.99 (0.63–1.57)
P. nigrescens
 Group 1 (lowest) 32/15616 8.3 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.60
 Group 2 42/23977 45.9 0.81 (0.51–1.29) 0.97 (0.61–1.53)
 Group 3 (highest) 44/23728 225.6 0.85 (0.54–1.35) 1.09 (0.69–1.74)
S. intermedius
 Group 1 (lowest) 66/35425 3.4 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.89
 Group 2 23/14126 37.5 0.88 (0.55–1.42) 0.99 (0.61–1.61)
 Group 3 (highest) 29/13770 248.5 1.10 (0.71–1.71) 1.03 (0.66–1.61)
S. noxia
 Group 1 (lowest) 83/47910 2.0 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.26
 Group 2 23/7511 30.0 1.59 (1.00–2.54) 1.58 (0.98–2.53)
 Group 3 (highest) 12/7901 217.8 0.89 (0.48–1.64) 0.67 (0.34–1.32)
S. oralis
 Group 1 (lowest) 56/34543 4.1 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.21
 Group 2 28/14642 35.9 1.18 (0.75–1.86) 1.00 (0.63–1.58)
 Group 3 (highest) 34/14137 149.5 1.44 (0.93–2.21) 1.30 (0.84–2.01)
S. sanguis
 Group 1 (lowest) 59/36488 2.5 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.62
 Group 2 30/13288 40.7 1.41 (0.91–2.20) 1.28 (0.82–2.01)
 Group 3 (highest) 29/13545 226.0 1.35 (0.87–2.12) 1.16 (0.73–1.82)
T. denticola
 Group 1 (lowest) 64/30472 10.9 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.35
 Group 2 25/16508 27.0 0.68 (0.42–1.07) 0.66 (0.42–1.06)
 Group 3 (highest) 29/16340 60.7 0.79 (0.50–1.22) 0.81 (0.52–1.26)
T. forsythensis
 Group 1 (lowest) 53/30841 8.7 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.68
 Group 2 39/16253 29.4 1.33 (0.88–2.02) 1.35 (0.89–2.06)
 Group 3 (highest) 26/16228 87.1 0.90 (0.56–1.44) 1.13 (0.70–1.82)
V. parvula
 Group 1 (lowest) 97/52851 1.8 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.69
 Group 2 (highest) 21/10470 36.2 1.01 (0.63–1.63) 0.91 (0.56–1.47)
Red complex
 Group 1 (lowest) 45/21329 24.8 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.22
 Group 2 41/21174 71.7 0.88 (0.57–1.34) 1.03 (0.68–1.58)
 Group 3 (highest) 32/20818 233.4 0.68 (0.43–1.08) 0.77 (0.48–1.23)
Orange complex
 Group 1 (lowest) 32/21572 60.7 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.28
 Group 2 40/21077 212.6 1.25 (0.78–1.99) 1.32 (0.83–2.10)
 Group 3 (highest) 46/20673 672.5 1.39 (0.88–2.20) 1.36 (0.86–2.14)
P. intermedia + P. nigrescens
 Group 1 (lowest) 40/21550 21.3 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.81
 Group 2 40/21072 96.5 0.98 (0.63–1.53) 1.18 (0.76–1.83)
 Group 3 (highest) 38/20700 397.8 0.93 (0.59–1.45) 1.11 (0.70–1.74)
All bacteria
 Group 1 (lowest) 38/21338 224.9 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.) 0.96
 Group 2 39/20976 733.8 1.01 (0.65–1.59) 1.18 (0.76–1.85)
 Group 3 (highest) 41/21008 2143.6 1.04 (0.66–1.62) 1.06 (0.68–1.66)
a

For each bacterium, Group 1 was participants with an antibody concentration at or below the limit of detection (20 ng/mL); Group 2 and Group 3 were participants with an antibody concentration above the limit of detection, divided at the median concentration; if the proportion of at or below the limit of detection was larger than 80% for the antibody, only one group was set for those with an antibody level above the limit of detection; For the sum of bacteria (red complex, orange complex, P. intermedia + P. nigrescens, and all bacteria), participants were divided into tertiles, where Group 1 was the lowest tertile and Group 3 was the highest tertile; All bacteria include 18 bacteria described in the study; Red complex bacteria include P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythensis; Orange complex bacteria include C. rectus, F. nucleatum, P. intermedia, P. micra, and P. nigrescens; HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; HRT = hormone replacement therapy; BMI = body mass index.

b

Model 1 was adjusted for age, joint terms for field center and race (Black from Jackson; Black from Forsyth; White from Forsyth; White from Washington County [reference is White from Minneapolis]), and joint terms for sex and HRT use (female user, female nonuser [reference is men]).

c

Model 2 was adjusted for all the variables in model 1, and additionally adjusted for cigarette smoking status, packyears smoked, alcohol drinking status, BMI, diagnosed diabetes status, undiagnosed diabetes status, at risk for diabetes status, family history of cancer; the model was weighted with a propensity score to control the confounding by socioeconomic status and access to and uptake of medical and dental care.

d

P value for trend for model 2 was from the Wald test of the coefficient for the ordinal variable of the 3 groups in a Cox proportional hazards regression.