Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 9;17:1057781. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1057781

TABLE 1.

Visual acuity, visual field, and tumor were compared between mild and heavy optic chiasma compression case groups.

Tumor and optic chiasma parameters (mm) Classification based on optic chiasma compression t P
Case group 1 Case group 2 Control group
BCVA (LogMAR)    0.15 ± 0.19    0.71 ± 0.61 0.03 ± 0.05 0.00
MD (dB)    1.29 ± 3.17    8.50 ± 7.53 0.62 ± 0.92 0.00
Epitaxial height of sella turcica diameter line   3.68 ± 2.76 16.69 ± 6.40 −9.39 0.00
Anteroposterior diameter line 19.98 ± 6.43 30.54 ± 7.91 −5.29 0.00
Horizontal diameter line 18.67 ± 6.43 26.57 ± 8.57 −3.78 0.00
Vertical diameter line 19.74 ± 6.10 36.08 ± 7.79 −8.42 0.00
Optic chiasma thickness   2.72 ± 0.91   1.57 ± 0.78 2.95 ± 0.25     4.97 0.00