Table 2.
Variable definition and measurement items.
| Variable | Index | Measurement items | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Using behavior (UB) | Using decision | Whether the fecal waste resources have been used (UB1) | 0.367 |
| Using intensity | The number of years of continuous fecal recycling (UB2) | 1.277 | |
| Behavior intention (BI) | Recommendation intention | Willing to recommend to others the degree of resource utilization of livestock manure (BI1) | 0.935 |
| Utilization intention | The degree of willingness to recycle livestock manure (BI2) | 0.981 | |
| Investment intention | Willing to invest a certain amount of money, time, labor and other costs in the process of recycling livestock manure (BI3) | 1.075 | |
| Perceived value (PV) | Behavior attitude | Positive attitude toward resource utilization of livestock manure (PV1) | 0.940 |
| Value cognition | It is believed that the resource utilization of livestock manure can bring certain benefits (PV2) | 0.912 | |
| Significance cognition | It is considered that the resource utilization of livestock manure has positive significance (PV3) | 0.922 | |
| Perceived risk (PR) | Economic risk | Concerned about the excessive labor, time, and money involved in the processing process (PR1) | 0.815 |
| Technical risk | Concerned about not being able to master the required knowledge and techniques (PR2) | 0.823 | |
| Policy risk | Concerned that the government’s relevant policy formulation and implementation is not in place (PR3) | 0.852 | |
| Perceived benefits (PB) | Economic benefits | Can reduce breeding cost, raise income level (PB1) | 0.998 |
| Ecological benefits | Can reduce the spread of disease and protect the ecological environment (PB2) | 0.958 | |
| Social benefits | Can promote ecological progress and the development of a new countryside (PB3) | 0.954 |