Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 9;14:1098587. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1098587

Table 2.

Variable definition and measurement items.

Variable Index Measurement items Standard deviation
Using behavior (UB) Using decision Whether the fecal waste resources have been used (UB1) 0.367
Using intensity The number of years of continuous fecal recycling (UB2) 1.277
Behavior intention (BI) Recommendation intention Willing to recommend to others the degree of resource utilization of livestock manure (BI1) 0.935
Utilization intention The degree of willingness to recycle livestock manure (BI2) 0.981
Investment intention Willing to invest a certain amount of money, time, labor and other costs in the process of recycling livestock manure (BI3) 1.075
Perceived value (PV) Behavior attitude Positive attitude toward resource utilization of livestock manure (PV1) 0.940
Value cognition It is believed that the resource utilization of livestock manure can bring certain benefits (PV2) 0.912
Significance cognition It is considered that the resource utilization of livestock manure has positive significance (PV3) 0.922
Perceived risk (PR) Economic risk Concerned about the excessive labor, time, and money involved in the processing process (PR1) 0.815
Technical risk Concerned about not being able to master the required knowledge and techniques (PR2) 0.823
Policy risk Concerned that the government’s relevant policy formulation and implementation is not in place (PR3) 0.852
Perceived benefits (PB) Economic benefits Can reduce breeding cost, raise income level (PB1) 0.998
Ecological benefits Can reduce the spread of disease and protect the ecological environment (PB2) 0.958
Social benefits Can promote ecological progress and the development of a new countryside (PB3) 0.954