Table 2.
Comparisons of NICE ween interactive training and self-driven training
| Before training | After training | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interactive training | Self-driven training | P | Interactive training | Self-driven training | P | |
| Total | n = 620 | n = 620 | n = 580 | n = 540 | ||
| Accuracy, n (%) | 446 (71.9) | 444 (71.6) | 0.900a | 453 (78.1) | 428 (79.3) | 0.637a |
| Color, n (%) | 416 (67.1) | 403 (65.0) | 0.436a | 464 (80.0) | 402 (74.4) | 0.027a |
| Vessel, n (%) | 433 (69.8) | 414 (66.8) | 0.246a | 450 (77.6) | 420 (77.8) | 0.939a |
| Surface pattern, n (%) | 433 (69.8) | 420 (67.7) | 0.426a | 446 (76.9) | 422 (78.1) | 0.616a |
| High confidence level | 345 (55.6) | 292 (47.1) | 0.003a | 474 (81.7) | 417 (77.2) | 0.062a |
| Accuracy, n (%) | 267 (77.4) | 215 (73.6) | 0.270a | 373 (78.7) | 352 (84.8) | 0.029a |
| Color, n (%) | 262 (75.9) | 207 (70.9) | 0.149a | 384 (81.0) | 332 (79.6) | 0.601a |
| Vessel, n (%) | 272 (78.8) | 212 (72.6) | 0.066a | 372 (78.5) | 346 (83.0) | 0.091a |
| Surface pattern, n (%) | 263 (76.2) | 218 (74.7) | 0.645a | 372 (78.5) | 341 (81.8) | 0.220a |
| Low confidence level | 275 (44.4) | 328 (52.9) | 0.003a | 106 (18.3) | 123 (22.8) | 0.062a |
| Accuracy, n (%) | 179 (65.1) | 229 (69.8) | 0.217a | 80 (75.5) | 76 (61.8) | 0.027a |
| Color, n (%) | 154 (56.0) | 196 (59.8) | 0.352a | 80 (75.5) | 70 (56.9) | 0.003a |
| Vessel, n (%) | 161 (58.5) | 202 (61.6) | 0.448a | 78 (73.6) | 74 (60.2) | 0.032a |
| Surface pattern, n (%) | 170 (61.8) | 202 (61.6) | 0.953a | 74 (69.8) | 81 (65.9) | 0.523a |
aPearson’s chi-square test