Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 13;8(7):7063–7069. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07926

Table 3. Comparison of LOD Values of the Developed Methods with Other Methods.

methods LOD (ng mL–1) references
ETAAS 0.20 (37)
ICP–MS 0.98 (38)
ICP–OES 0.2 (39)
HGAAS 0.7 (40)
SQT-AT-FAAS 0.075 this study