. 2023 Feb 23;117(1):1–272. doi: 10.1007/s13225-022-00513-0

Table 2.

Morphological comparison among strains of Nodulosphaeria digitalis with sexual morph described

Strain	Host	Ascomata (μm)	Ostioles	Asci (μm)	Ascospores	Reference
N. digitalis MFLUCC 17–2418	Campanula trachelium	141.9 × 154	52.5 μm diam No setae	83 × 9	25 × 5 μm; 4-septate	Chaiwan et al. (2019)
N. digitalis MFLUCC 18–1138	Thalictrum sp.	263.7 × 217.9	71.2 µm diam No setae	84.1 × 10.1	32.3 × 4.5 μm; 7–8-septate	Hyde et al. (2019)
N. digitalis MFLU xx	Solidago virgaurea	192.3 × 213.1	52.2 µm diam Setae present	74.1 × 9.2	22.6 × 3.7 µm; 4–5-septate	This study

Strain

Host

Ascomata (μm)

Ostioles

Asci (μm)

Ascospores

Reference

N. digitalis MFLUCC 17–2418

Campanula trachelium

141.9 × 154

52.5 μm diam

No setae

83 × 9

25 × 5 μm;

4-septate

Chaiwan et al. (2019)

N. digitalis MFLUCC 18–1138

Thalictrum sp.

263.7 × 217.9

71.2 µm diam

No setae

84.1 × 10.1

32.3 × 4.5 μm;

7–8-septate

Hyde et al. (2019)

N. digitalis MFLU xx

Solidago virgaurea

192.3 × 213.1

52.2 µm diam

Setae present

74.1 × 9.2

22.6 × 3.7 µm;

4–5-septate

This study