Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 25;44(2):133–141. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1741456

Table 4. Adjusted Poisson regression for premenstrual syndrome in relation to sociodemographic, behavioral, reproductive, and health variables of students at a university in Midwest Brazil, 2018 ( n  = 1,115) .

Level Variables PR (95% CI) p -value
1 Course period (semester) 0.001 a
 ≥ 9 th 1
 7 th and 8 th 1.19 (0.93–1.52)
 5 th and 6 th 1.17 (0.92–1.49)
 3 rd and 4 th 1.30 (1.03–1.63)
 1 st and 2 nd 1.44 (1.14–1.80)
2 Eating habits * 0.058 b
 Unhealthy 1
 Healthy 0.88 (0.76–1.00)
Alcohol consumption (last 30 days) 0.018 b
 No 1
 Yes 1.23 (1.04–1.47)
Use of hormonal contraceptives 0.115 a
 No
 1 0.94 (0.80–1.10)
 2 or + 1.22 (1.02–1.46)
Menarche 0.094 b
 ≥ 12 years 1
 < 12 years 1.13 (0.98–1.30)
3 Depression ** < 0.001 b
 No 1
 Yes 1.49 (1.30–1.71)

Abbreviations: 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; PR, prevalence ratio.

Each variable was adjusted to the others at the same or previous level in a hierarchical model of causality. Only variables associated with the outcome at p  < 0.20 in the unadjusted model were subsequently entered and retained in the final multivariate-adjusted model.

*

Healthy eating habits considered: consumption of fruits and vegetables ≥ 5 days/week.

**

Diagnosed by a doctor, as reported by the student.

a

Wald test, p -value for linear trend.

b

Wald test, p -value for heterogeneity.