Table 5. Upgraded Performance Parameters Values Have Been Compared with Previously Published Reportsa.
| number | type of analysis | formation of cell | MoS2 depth (nm) | JSC (mA/cm2) | VOC (mV) | FF (%) | η (%) | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Exp. | ITO/MoS2 | 110 | 0.7 | (24) | |||
| 02 | Exp. | ITO/MoS2 | 220 | 1.8 | (24) | |||
| 03 | Exp. | ITO/TiO2/MoS2/P3HT | 4.7 | 560 | – | 1.3 | (25) | |
| 04 | Exp. | n-MoS2 (monolayer)/p-Si | 22.32 | 410 | 57.26 | 5.23 | (27) | |
| 05 | Exp. | WSe2/MoS2 | ∼10 | (26) | ||||
| 06 | Theo. | n-ZnO/n-CdS/p-MoS2 | 1000 | 19.62 | (28) | |||
| 07 | Theo. | ITO/n-ZnSe/p-MoS2 | 27.84 | 820 | 84.6 | 19.48 | (29) | |
| 08 | Theo. | ITO/n-ZnSe/p-MoS2/p+-SnS | 1000 | 29.89 | 841 | 85 | 21.39 | (29) |
| 09 | Theo. | Al/FTO/n-CdS/p-MoS2/Ni | 1000 | 34.11 | 760 | 82.80 | 21.61 | (62) |
| 10 | Theo. | Al/FTO/CdS/MoS2/p+-Sb2S3/Ni | 1000 | 35.20 | 920 | 85.51 | 27.96 | (62) |
| 11 | Theo. | ITO/TiO2/MoS2 | 800 | 34.89 | 793 | 80.62 | 22.30 | this work |
| 12 | Theo. | ITO/TiO2/MoS2/In2Te3 | 800 | 37.22 | 1084 | 82.58 | 33.32 | this work |
a
Exp. = experimental work and Theo. = theoretical work.