Table 4. What improved in depression, stress, and pain.
Source | What improved | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Depression | Stress | Pain | ||
Pelvic pain | Dyschezia | |||
Lorençatto et al. (2007) 9 | 22.8 ± 10.2 versus 17.0 ± 10.2 ( p < 0.0001). | X | 4.2 ± 3.3 versus 6.6 ± 2.4 ( p = 0.0002) general | X |
Meissner et al. (2016) 16 | X | X | (-1.4. 95%CI: 2.7–- 0.1; p = 0.036) pelvic | (-3 .5. 95% CI: - 5.8–-1.3; p =.003) |
Kold et al. (2012) 17 | X | X | 52.53 ± 12.52 versus 33.18 ± 15.46; p > 0.005 | X |
Hansen et al. (2016) 18 | X | X | - 10.83 versus - 18.1; p = 0.583 | X |
Friggi Sebe Petrelluzzi et al. (2012) 19 | X | Acknowledge stress: 0.62 ± 0.02 versus 0.56 ± 0.02; p < 0.05 | X | X |
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Initial (before intervention) versus Final (after intervention)