Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 1;103-B(10):1561–1570. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B10.BJJ-2020-1919.R2

Table IV.

Comparison of clinical scores based on the patients' perception of the allocation of treatment and those who were unsure of their allocation.

Variable TKA bi-UKA Unsure
Total, n
TKA 5 10 20
Bi-UKA 1 15 13
Correct, % 83 60
Mean pain VAS (SD)
Preop 7.4 (1.8) 6.4 (2.7) 7.0 (1.8)
1 yr 4.0 (3.0) 1.1 (1.1)* 1.9 (2.6)
Mean OKS (SD)
Preop 16.7 (10.1) 22.2 (9.3) 19.4 (7.6)
1 yr 31.3 (11.1) 38.8 (8.3) 37.0 (9.5)
Mean NKSS (SD)
Preop 94.0 (21.4) 103.4 (28.4) 100.1 (27.0)
1 yr 137.1 (39.0) 155.4 (31.4) 155.2 (38.4)
*

Perceived treatment TKA vs perceived treatment bi-UKA; p = 0.002, one-way analysis of variance with Fisher’s least significant difference post-test for multiple comparisons.

Perceived treatment TKA vs unsure participants; p-value = 0.018, one-way analysis of variance with Fisher’s least significant difference post-test for multiple comparisons.

bi-UKA, bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; NKSS, New Knee Society Score; OKS, Oxford Knee Score; SD, standard deviation; TKA, total knee arthroplasty; VAS, visual analogue scale.