Table 3.
Multiple regression analysis on FLE and L2 motivation at different proficiency levels.
| Regression equations | Fit index | Coefficient | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | Outcome | R | R 2 | F | Value of p | t | |
| Group1 | FLE-Private | L2MSS | 0.766 | 0.587 | 41.273** | 0.014 | 2.496 |
| FLE-Teacher | 0.942 | −0.072 | |||||
| FLE-Atmosphere | 0.000 | 4.696 | |||||
| Group2 | FLE-Private | L2MSS | 0.841 | 0.707 | 196.249** | 0.000 | 7.957 |
| FLE-Teacher | 0.006 | 2.772 | |||||
| FLE-Atmosphere | 0.000 | 3.599 | |||||
| Group3 | FLE-Private | L2MSS | 0.804 | 0.647 | 81.923** | 0.000 | 5.248 |
| FLE-Teacher | 0.890 | 0.139 | |||||
| FLE-Atmosphere | 0.000 | 4.116 | |||||
| Group4 | FLE-Private | L2MSS | 0.746 | 0.557 | 12.971** | 0.037 | 2.179 |
| FLE-Teacher | 0.016 | 2.543 | |||||
| FLE-Atmosphere | 0.655 | 0.451 | |||||
** p < 0.01.