TABLE 7.
OTUs presenting differential abundances in feces among the HS and LS shedding classesa
| Sampling day | OTU | Log2 fold change | Phylum | Family | Genus | P.adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Cluster_61 | 3.29 | Firmicutes | Ruminococcaceae | [Eubacterium] coprostanoligenes group | 8.49E-03 |
| D2 | Cluster_50 | –4.37 | Proteobacteria | Enterobacteriaceae | Salmonella | 1.64E-04 |
| Cluster_44 | –5.51 | Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidaceae | Bacteroides | 3.26E-04 | |
| Cluster_145 | –5.89 | Fusobacteria | Fusobacteriaceae | Fusobacterium | 1.92E-06 | |
| Cluster_172 | –2.98 | Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidaceae | Bacteroides | 4.13E-03 | |
| Cluster_423 | –6.99 | Proteobacteria | Pasteurellaceae | Actinobacillus | 2.30E-08 | |
| Cluster_316 | –6.34 | Proteobacteria | Pasteurellaceae | Actinobacillus | 1.55E-07 | |
| Cluster_250 | –5.52 | Firmicutes | Lachnospiraceae | [Acetivibrio] ethanol gignens group | 9.17E-06 | |
| Cluster_18 | 3.92 | Cyanobacteria | Unknown_family | Unknown genus | 7.03E-04 | |
| Cluster_148 | –2.77 | Bacteroidetes | Marinifilaceae | Odoribacter | 3.26E-03 | |
| Cluster_182 | –3.28 | Bacteroidetes | Barnesiellaceae | Coprobacter | 3.78E-03 | |
| D3 | Cluster_44 | –7.80 | Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidaceae | Bacteroides | 2.21E-03 |
| Cluster_21 | –3.49 | Proteobacteria | Enterobacteriaceae | Escherichia -Shigella | 2.21E-03 | |
| Cluster_50 | –4.72 | Proteobacteria | Enterobacteriaceae | Salmonella | 1.26E-03 | |
| Cluster_62 | –3.79 | Bacteroidetes | Marinifilaceae | Butyricimonas | 1.09E-03 | |
| Cluster_145 | –12.43 | Fusobacteria | Fusobacteriaceae | Fusobacterium | 6.81E-04 | |
| Cluster_134 | –2.92 | Proteobacteria | Desulfovibrionaceae | Desulfovibrio | 3.17E-03 | |
| Cluster_172 | –3.67 | Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidaceae | Bacteroides | 2.21E-03 | |
| Cluster_148 | –3.60 | Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidaceae | Odoribacter | 1.07E-03 | |
| D10 | Cluster_26 | –4.09 | Firmicutes | Lactobacillaceae | Lactobacillus | 1.27E-03 |
OTUs enriched in HS and LS are shown in dark gray and light gray cells, respectively. The log2 fold change and corresponding adjusted P value (P.adj) are reported. Only the most abundant features (Nseq > 1,000) are reported.