Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 20;11:e14868. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14868

Table 7. Results of included studies evaluating surface properties of disinfected condensation silicone impression materials.

Study Disinfection procedures Surface properties evaluatedb
Type and concentration of disinfectants Disinfection method Disinfection duration Control groupa Dimensional stability Detail reproduction Surface roughness
Adabo et al. (1999) 5.25% sodium hypochlorite Immersion 10 min A NS NR NR
2% glutaraldehyde 30 min NS NR NR
Carvalhal et al. (2011) 0.5% sodium hypochlorite Immersion 5/10/20 min W NS NR NR
2% glutaraldehyde NS NR NR
0.5% sodium hypochlorite 30/60 min S NR NR
2% glutaraldehyde S NR NR
Guiraldo et al. (2017) 2% sodium hypochlorite Immersion 15 min NR S NS NR
Lad et al. (2015) 4% sodium hypochlorite Immersion 10 min, 10 min NR NR NR NS
2% glutaraldehyde NR NR NS
Saleh Saber, Abolfazli & Kohsoltani (2010) 0.525% sodium hypochlorite Spray 10 min NR NS NR NR
Silva & Salvador (2004) 1% sodium hypochlorite Immersion 10/20 min A NS NR NR
2% glutaraldehyde NS NR NR
Sinobad et al. (2014) 5.25% sodium hypochlorite Immersion 10 min NR S NR NR
Thouati et al. (1996) 5.25% sodium hypochlorite Immersion 30 min NR S NR NR

Notes.

a

Dental impressions of control groups were kept in air (A), water (W) or wet environment (WE). NR: Dental impressions of control groups were not reported to be kept in air, water or wet environment.

b

Effects of disinfection on the surface properties of dental impressions are indicated as follows: S, significant difference was found when compared to control group; NS, no significant difference; NR, not reported.