Table 7. Results of included studies evaluating surface properties of disinfected condensation silicone impression materials.
| Study | Disinfection procedures | Surface properties evaluatedb | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type and concentration of disinfectants | Disinfection method | Disinfection duration | Control groupa | Dimensional stability | Detail reproduction | Surface roughness | |
| Adabo et al. (1999) | 5.25% sodium hypochlorite | Immersion | 10 min | A | NS | NR | NR |
| 2% glutaraldehyde | 30 min | NS | NR | NR | |||
| Carvalhal et al. (2011) | 0.5% sodium hypochlorite | Immersion | 5/10/20 min | W | NS | NR | NR |
| 2% glutaraldehyde | NS | NR | NR | ||||
| 0.5% sodium hypochlorite | 30/60 min | S | NR | NR | |||
| 2% glutaraldehyde | S | NR | NR | ||||
| Guiraldo et al. (2017) | 2% sodium hypochlorite | Immersion | 15 min | NR | S | NS | NR |
| Lad et al. (2015) | 4% sodium hypochlorite | Immersion | 10 min, 10 min | NR | NR | NR | NS |
| 2% glutaraldehyde | NR | NR | NS | ||||
| Saleh Saber, Abolfazli & Kohsoltani (2010) | 0.525% sodium hypochlorite | Spray | 10 min | NR | NS | NR | NR |
| Silva & Salvador (2004) | 1% sodium hypochlorite | Immersion | 10/20 min | A | NS | NR | NR |
| 2% glutaraldehyde | NS | NR | NR | ||||
| Sinobad et al. (2014) | 5.25% sodium hypochlorite | Immersion | 10 min | NR | S | NR | NR |
| Thouati et al. (1996) | 5.25% sodium hypochlorite | Immersion | 30 min | NR | S | NR | NR |
Notes.
Dental impressions of control groups were kept in air (A), water (W) or wet environment (WE). NR: Dental impressions of control groups were not reported to be kept in air, water or wet environment.
Effects of disinfection on the surface properties of dental impressions are indicated as follows: S, significant difference was found when compared to control group; NS, no significant difference; NR, not reported.