Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 23;69(3):254–259. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001837

Table 2.

Management Strategies Among Three Waves of COVID-19 Patients Receiving ECMO

Management Wave 1 (n = 17) Wave 2 (n = 19) Wave 3 (n = 12) p
Noninvasive ventilation time, days ,,§ 0.71 ± 0.77 8.8 ± 4.4 3.9 ± 3.6 <0.01*
Pre-ECMO ventilation time, days 5.5 ± 2.9 3.7 ± 2.5 4.2 ± 3.7 0.19
Diagnosis to cannulation time, days ,§ 8.8 ± 6.3 17.2 ± 3.4 14.6 ± 3.7 <0.01*
APRV 9 (53%) 12 (63%) 3 (25%) 0.11
Inhaled nitric oxide 15 (88%) 19 (100%) 9 (75%) 0.06
Prone positioning 17 (100%) 18 (95%) 12 (100%) 1.00
Neuromuscular blockade 18 (100%) 20 (100%) 12 (100%) 1.00
Vasopressors 13 (76%) 15 (79%) 12 (100%) 0.21
COVID-19 therapies
 Glucocorticoids ,,§ 5 (29%) 19 (100%) 12 (100%) <0.01*
 Hydroxychloroquine 2 (12%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 0.61
 Remdesivir ,,§ 6 (35%) 16 (84%) 11 (92%) <0.01*
 Anti-IL-6 10 (59%) 5 (26%) 7 (58%) 0.14

Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%).

*

Global test for differences between waves (p-value ≤0.05).

Comparison of wave 1 and wave 3 (p < 0.05).

Comparison of wave 2 and wave 3 (p < 0.05).

§

Comparison of wave 1 and wave 2 (p < 0.05).

APRV, airway pressure release ventilation; COVID-19, coronavirus 2019; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; IL-6, Interleukin 6.