Table 3.

Influence of Covariates on the Effect of HAR Regarding the Embolic Volume Delivered

logVGMEpost	Coefficient	Standard Error	95% CI	p	Exponential (Coefficient)	95% CI Exponential (Coefficient)
HAR	−1.42	0.55	−2.51 to −0.33	0.01	0.24	0.08–0.72
Age	−0.01	0.02	−0.05 to 0.02	0.42	0.99	0.95–1.02
Hgbfinal	0.07	0.19	−0.31 to 0.45	0.73	1.07	0.73–1.57
TªNadir	−0.61	0.47	−1.54 to 0.32	0.20	0.54	0.21–1.38
Tªfinal	0.63	0.52	−0.41 to 1.67	0.23	1.88	0.67–5.29
Ultrafiltration	−0.20	0.55	−1.29 to 0.88	0.71	0.82	0.28–2.42
VAVD <−40 mmHg	0.54	0.98	−1.41 to 2.49	0.59	1.71	0.24–12.02

Final, measured at the end of CPB; HAR, hematic antegrade repriming; Hgb, hemoglobin; Nadir, minimum in CPB; Tª, temperature; Ultrafiltration, use of continuous ultrafiltration; VAVD, vacuum-assisted venous drainage (The reference category for the regression model was the CG).