Skip to main content
. 2022 May 23;69(3):324–331. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001776

Table 4.

Influence of Covariates on the Effect of HAR Regarding the Number of Emboli Delivered

logNGMEpost Coefficient Standard Error 95% CI p Exponential (Coefficient) 95% CI Exponential (Coefficient)
HAR −0.61 0.39 −1.39 to 0.18 0.13 0.55 0.25–1.19
Age −0.02 0.01 −0.04 to 0.01 0.14 0.98 0.96–1.01
Hgbfinal 0.08 0.14 −0.19 to 0.35 0.57 1.08 0.82–1.42
Nadir −0.17 0.34 −0.84 to 0.49 0.61 0.84 0.43–1.64
final 0.17 0.37 −0.57 to 0.91 0.65 1.19 0.57–2.49
Ultrafiltration 0.29 0.39 −0.49 to 1.06 0.47 1.33 0.61–2.89
VAVD <−40 mmHg 0.95 0.70 −0.45 to 2.34 0.18 2.58 0.64–10.42

Final, measured at the end of CPB; HAR, hematic antegrade repriming; Hgb, hemoglobin; Nadir, minimum in CPB; Tª, temperature; Ultrafiltration, use of continuous ultrafiltration; VAVD, vacuum-assisted venous drainage (The reference categoryfor the regression model was the CG was the CG).