Table 1.
Variable | Healthy Comparison (HC) | MDD | Omnibus Test | Post hoc comparison p values | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Euphagic (Eu) | Hypophagic (Hypo) | Hyperphagic (Hyper) | ||||
N | 38 | 42 | 66 | 77 | - | - |
Age in years, mean (SD) | 38.1 (14.9) | 35.8 (12.5) | 35.3 (11.6) | 38.4 (13.5) |
F = 0.84 p = 0.486a |
- |
Women, number (%) | 24 (63.2) | 25 (59.5) | 42 (63.6) | 62 (80.5) | p = 0.038b | = 0.017 Hyper > Eu = 0.037 Hyper > Hypo = 0.066 Hyper > HC = 0.819 HC – Eu = 1.000 HC – Hypo = 0.688 Hypo – Eu |
Body mass index in kg/m2, mean (SD) | 25.0 (3.8) | 26.8 (6.6) | 25.9 (5.5) | 31.4 (6.8) |
F = 12.88 p < 0.001a |
= 0.001 Hyper > Eu < 0.001 Hyper > Hypo < 0.001 Hyper > HC = 0.598 HC – Eu = 0.897 HC – Hypo = 0.895 Hypo – Eu |
Education in years, mean (SD) | 15.2 (2.2) | 15.6 (2.3) | 15.0 (2.8) | 15.1 (2.4) | F = 0.11 p = 0.952a |
- |
Other | 2 (5.3) | 2 (4.7) | 6 (9.0) | 5 (6.5) | ||
Hispanic or Latino origin, number (%) | 3 (7.9) | 7 (16.6) | 12 (18.1) | 21 (27.2) | p = 0.088b | - |
Mood congruent psychotic features | 0 (0) | 1 (1.5) | 0 (0) | |||
Recurrent | 29 (69.0) | 57 (86.3) | 69 (89.7) | |||
Age at MDD onset in years, mean (SD) | - | 15.7 (5.4) | 16.2 (5.9) | 17.4 (6.2) | F = 1.30 p = 0.274a |
- |
Length of current major depressive episode in months, median | - | 24.0 | 12.5 | 12.0 | X2 = 3.662 p = 0.160c |
- |
Number of prior major depressive episodes, median | - | 3 | 4 | 4 | X2 = 5.811 p = 0.054c |
- |
QIDS weight change score, mean (SD) | - | 0 (1.1) | −1.1 (1.3) | 1.6 (1.4) | F = 60.23a p < 0.001a |
< 0.001 Hyper > Eu > Hypo |
Other current diagnosese, No. (%) | ||||||
Mood and anxiety symptoms questionnaire |
Note: p-values are comparisons between groups via one-way ANOVA (and Tukey’s Test for post hoc comparisons when applicable),
Fisher’s Exact tests, or
Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) overall scores did not include the items measuring appetite/weight change. QIDS appetite change scores were calculated by multiplying the item assessing decreased appetite by −1 and adding it to the item assessing increased appetite, resulting in a composite appetite change score that ranged from −3 to 3; the same procedure was used to create a composite weight change score.
Using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (Kübler, 2013).
There was no significant difference between MDD groups for the other clinical measures unless stated otherwise.