Table 5.
Preferred sources of AMR information by participants with and without exposure to the intervention
| Description | Overall N (%) | The patient was provided with additional information on the health and economic consequences of AMR | Alpha | |
| No (group A) | Yes (group B) | |||
| Point of healthcare delivery, that is, clinic and hospital (yes) | 667 (83.4) | 294 (73.5) | 373 (93.3) | P<0.01 |
| Licensed pharmacy and drug store (yes) | 706 (88.3) | 334 (83.5) | 372 (93.0) | P<0.01 |
| Community information system (yes) | 224 (28.0) | 141 (35.3) | 83 (20.8) | P<0.01 |
| Print media* (yes) | 128 (16.0) | 52 (13.0) | 76 (19.0) | P<0.05 |
| Digital/social media platforms† (yes) | 426 (53.3) | 230 (57.5) | 196 (49.0) | P<0.05 |
| Television broadcast and information sharing (yes) | 704 (88.0) | 367 (91.8) | 337 (84.3) | P<0.01 |
| Radio broadcast (yes) | 255 (31.9) | 206 (51.5) | 49 (12.3) | P<0.01 |
| School textbooks (should be taught in school) (yes) | 619 (77.4) | 289 (72.3) | 330 (82.5) | P<0.01 |
Note: Group A—participants not exposed to the intervention (n=400); group B—participants exposed to the intervention (n=400).
*Book covers, newspapers, fliers, etc.
†Voice messages, short message service, Facebook, Twitter.
AMR, antimicrobial resistance.